[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.



Hi Brian.
 
I guess a sub could be engineered to have a ballast tank UNDER the hull and it not flip it over if the rest of the keel was heavy enough and more buoyancy was at the top
 
than at the keel. But it makes me nervous thinking about having buoyancy low even in THAT instance. If your keel is where your most weight is and your buoyancy is always
 
higher than than that, then you will never have to worry about it. But yes it could be done and as you mentioned has been. It just makes me nervous and I think if I were building
 
a 1 atm I would keep ALL the buoyancy higher than the keel.
 
Bill.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Myles Hall
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.

Bill,
 
   Thanks for that.
 
   I have been giving the design much thought.  Have drawn and redrawn a lot of plans.
 
   My plan from the onset was to make the sub U-boat -esque in that I wanted something long and lean, diesel electric, with decent surface performance.  I arrived at a length of 30' max from tip to tail, being what I could feasibly transport. I have calculated a pressure hull length of 10' x 36" which would be in the middle of the 30' overall length.  The two ends on either side, which would give the sub some hydrodynamics, I was planning on making into for/aft soft ballast tanks out of a fibreglass shape.  The "saddle" tanks were going to be compressed air reserviors (following the principle of having your bouyancy up high).  I figured I would need substantial air reserve to blow tanks of such size.  My bat pods will be mounted low in the floor within the pressure hull but in their own sealed compartments for safety reasons.  The fuel cell will also be mounted low with vents and the filler cap accesible from the floor.  All the while I am trying to design the sub with the weight down low, and the bouyancy up high.  ....then comes the variable ballast tank.  My design called for mounting it directly underneath the pressure hull amidships in that I wanted to control just the one tank to obtain neutral bouyancy.  I was looking at the design of actual U-boats which also have a similar tank directly underneath the control room amidships.  I was working under the assumption that with all the other weight down low, as well as a weighted keel that will be under the tank, that would be sufficient to keep the boat stable, both surface and submerged.  The primary function of this variable ballast tank is to compensate the weight lost as a result of the diesel fuel consumption.
 
   That's the basic premise from which I'm working from.
 
Myles.
  From: Akins
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.

Hi Myles.
 
You could use your for/aft soft ballast tanks as hard ballast trim tanks too. But the big boats have their tanks opposite of how you are using yours. See the first paragraph of the explaination I sent you below on soft/hard ballast.
 
Most big boats have the soft ballast tanks mounted high along each side of the hull. These are the tanks they mainly use to surface and for stability on the surface and to keep them up high (freeboard) on the surface.
 
The big boats use bow and stern hard ballast trim tanks. In your case you are using your bow and stern as soft ballast or main surfacing ballast. and want to use them as hard ballast trim tanks as well, and want to use
 
another amidships tank as hard ballast too. I guess you can do that, but you might want to think about using your bow and stern tanks as hard trim ballast tanks ONLY and increase the size of your amidships tank to make IT
 
the soft ballast tank. Also you do NOT want to put any ballast tank under the hull. You always want to keep your buoyancy high so you don't flip upside down like a turtle on its back. Of course many different designs use
 
ballast tanks in different ways and whatever is a sound design and works is fine. But I would suggest you think about something like this....Use your bow and stern tanks for hard trim ballast and build your main large soft
 
ballast tanks along the side of your hull up somewhat high on the sides so your buoyancy is high and not low. That is one way you could design it and it would be more like the big boats. Look at different designs in subs
 
and decide what type of ballasting system is best for what you want to build Myles. There are many different ways you can do it. You just have to decide which is best for you. But always remember to keep your air bubble
 
(buoyancy) up high so you don't flip and it takes you to the surface smoothly without rocking.
 
 
 
Bill.
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Myles Hall
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.

Bill,
 
   Thanks for the explanation.
 
   Is there a reason why a guy couldn't use his fore/aft soft ballast tanks as trim tanks ?  If I'm at 50M and need to trim the bow up, could I not just put a little air in the fore main ballast tank ?  Again, as long as I had sufficient psi to do it.  I want to design a very operable sub, yet keep the ballast tanks to a minimum.  I was thinking of fore/aft main ballast tanks (soft) with a (hard) tank amidships underneath the hull as a variable ballast tank, used for those compensations in weight to attain neutral bouyancy.  Is this sufficient or should a guy design something with hard trim tanks as well ?  I figure the big boats have them for a reason, I just don't know what that reason is.
 
Myles.
----- Original Message -----
From: Akins
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.

Hi Myles.
 
 
Hard ballast and soft ballast have nothing to do with hardness. Here's an article that may explain it to you.....
 

When a submarine is on the surface, its "soft" ballast tanks are full of air. These tanks are mounted high along each side of the hull, and are open to the sea at the bottom. Air is forced through valves at the top of the tanks, which displaces sea water and gives the submarine its surface stability and a minimum of 30" of freeboard between the water line and the top of the hatch combing. When the pilot is prepared to dive the submarine, he actuates exhaust valves in the top of the tanks which vent the air and allow the sea water to fill the tanks again.

Differential ballast is provided by the "hard" ballast tanks which are designed to allow the submarine to achieve weightlessness or "neutral buoyancy" when it's submerged. The hard tanks must be filled with sea water if the submarine has just a few passengers, and they are empty if the vehicle is fully loaded. Water can be pumped back and forth between the bow hard tanks and the stern hard tanks to adjust the trim of the vessel. Some vessels also have a trim weight beneath the pressure hull that can be moved back and forth on a track to provide pitch trim.

Safety

Contemporary tourist submarines have a perfect safety record, having carried in excess of 7 million passengers without a single serious injury or fatality. Much of the credit for that safety record goes to the American Bureau of Shipping, an organization that "classifies" marine vessels. The ABS approves the submarine design and engineering, insures the safety of the materials used during construction, tests and inspects the various submarine systems, and attends the vessel's sea trials. Ongoing annual inspections are also required.

In American waters the United States Coast Guard duplicates much of the work done by the ABS, and also stipulates requirements for the experience levels and licensing of the submersible crew, insures the existence of adequate documentation, and enforces compliance with a substantial body of safety regulations.

In the event of an emergency, the pilot, who is in contact with the surface by underwater telephone, may employ a number of safety features. The submarine has an automated Halon fire extinguishing system, and each passenger has a closed system rebreather for use in case of a fire that is capable of providing oxygen for a minimum of two hours. An emergency ascent can be accomplished by 1) blowing high pressure air into the soft tanks, 2) dropping an emergency drop weight composed of several tons of lead ballast, 3) blowing the hard ballast tanks full of air, and 4) using the electric vertical thrusters. As an additional aid to safety, no tourist submarine may operate in waters deeper than its maximum design depth, typically between 150' and 328'.

 

You are correct Myles about the ballast tanks being as ambient when flooded or blown. One thing you can do is have the bottom of your ballast tanks open so the air can spill out

if you overblow them like in the kittridge K350 sub. Some guys fill in the bottoms almost all the way but leave a hole for excess air to spill out. That way they don't "burp" as
 
much from air spilling out of them when you don't want it to like in choppy water. Remember, the air always goes up. So you can put an overpressure valve in your tank to
 
vent the excess air or you can just make a hole in the bottom. Does the same thing except the hole can't fail on you like the valve can. Also you could use a sliding weight
 
under your keel in place of or along with hard ballast tanks. For instance, you could use a long piece of stainless steel threaded rod. Then attach a weight to it so that when
 
you crank the rod it moves the weight back and forth under the sub for trimming it out. I have been thinking of making something like this for my wetsub instead of using hard trim tanks,
 
but I haven't made up my mind on that yet. I would suggest for your ambient design having both so in an emergency you have extra tanks to blow if needed. In my wetsub it is not as
 
critical because I can easily bail or use my personal Buoyancy control device (BCD) for extra lift if necessary.  Hope this helped you.
 
Bill.
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Myles Hall
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:36 PM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hard / soft ballast tanks.

Gents,
 
   Hard / soft ballast tanks....what exactly are we talking about here ?  Hard ones made of...hard material and soft ones made of inflatable bags or something ?
 
   In contemplating my design for the fore and aft main ballast tanks, it occured to me that the construction of these tanks does not have to be up to the same standard as the pressure hull, even if purged at depth, due to the fact that the forcing of air into the tanks to purge the water creates an "ambient" enviroment within the tank, equalizing the pressures put upon it.  Is my line of thinking correct ?  In other words, as far as the ballast tanks are concerned, it shouldn't matter if the internal and external pressures are equal due to the tank being filled with water, or compressed air.  As long as your high pressure air supply has enough psi to force the water out, it should be possible to blow the tanks at any depth.  Again, am I on the right track with this thinking ?  One of the reasons I am enquiring about this is I am wondering if it's possible to use fore/aft main ballast tanks as trim tanks as well ?  For eg. if I'm at a depth of 50M in my 1ATM sub (with fore/aft tanks filled with water), and I discover that my trim isn't quite right, that I require a little lift in the front, can I put a little air into the fore main ballast tank, or will this damage the tank since the construction of it is quite light.  I suppose if it is possible to blow the tanks at any depth, you would want some sort of check valve to bleed off the excess pressure that would occur from surfacing, or risk blowing your ballast tanks up, sinking, and dying.
 
Myles.