[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
From: shawl@torchlake.com (Jonathan Shawl)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 09:05:46 -0500
References: <e57108f6.36d86e8d@aol.com> <36D9D630.37D7A611@torchlake.com> <36DA26A0.40CCBCD5@mediaone.net> <36DA2C2A.1449B865@torchlake.com> <36DA3494.EBF100E8@mediaone.net> <36DA3C96.240ECD92@torchlake.com> <36DA44EF.1420500E@mediaone.net>

Alan Long wrote:

> Jon,
>
> Of coarse the chamber was water filled !
> What did I say that made you feel I was using air ???
> >It sounded like a gun shot !!!

I didn't think it would be that loud if it was a small water filled test rig.
I guess I made an assumption, sorry about that.
Was the bang just from the cracking or exploding plastic view port?
How big was the water filled chamber? volume?
How big was the lens?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: Alan Long <subview@mediaone.net>

References:
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: Alan Long <subview@mediaone.net>
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: shawl@torchlake.com (Jonathan Shawl)
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: Alan Long <subview@mediaone.net>
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: shawl@torchlake.com (Jonathan Shawl)
- Re: Unmanned test dives, a safty question
  - From: Alan Long <subview@mediaone.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Too much debate - JUST THE FACTS,svp.
Next by Date: RE: The First PSUBs Fatality
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread