| 
 Thanks David 
The problem with the standard thru hull you are suggesting 
would take in excess of a month to reach me in this part of the world ,is it 
a skin fitting type or does it also need to be welded in?does one attach it 
to the C.T or some where else . 
Glen SA 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:29 
  PM 
  Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] RE: 
  Hydrophones 
  
  Glen,     We just voted on a standard thru hull 
  fitting that will accommodate the various underwater comms to include UQC. I 
  would suggest you use this fitting as future use of it is all but 
  ensured. I believe a club discount may exist for this device.   
  The broadband system I am providing uses 4 wires at present with future 
  construction making use of but only two.   Someone steer Glen to the 
  thru hull information as to ordering and specifics 
  please.                                                                                       
  David Bartsch      
   
  From: glenbrown@vodamail.co.za To: 
  personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] RE: 
  Hydrophones Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:16:35 +0200
  
  
  Hi David 
  I know this has nothing to do with the subject,I am busy 
  making and fitting every kind of thru hull that I think I may use in future as 
  you seem to be the bof on com's have you any suggestions on what I could 
  make to accommodate for  com's and hydrophone of which I 
  nothing . 
  Thanks 
  Glen SA 
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 9:21 
    PM 
    Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] RE: 
    Hydrophones 
    
  Jim,        Lets ask Jens 
    Laland! He seems to know this kind of stuff. I had a BQS-04 on my 
    boat. Something to make note of...      BQS-* 
    usually indicates "send".. that's what the "s" 
    designates.      BQR-* usually designates "receive of 
    listen" that's what the "r" designates.      The BQR-2 
    system was the system prior to the BQR-21 which my sub was equipped with and 
    may be a stave (a stack of one or more passive hydrophones arranged in a 
    single row.) In other words it may not be designed for active transmissions 
    at all. You have a gem there so be sure what it was designed for before 
    damaging it.      Jens, help us out 
    here...                                                                                         
    David Bartsch   > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:19:42 
    -0800 > Subject: Hydrophones > From: 
    jimrudholm@gmail.com > To: dbartsch2236@hotmail.com >  > 
    Hello, > I have enjoyed your posts on the Psubs site and Doug and 
    Kay's site. >  > I have several hydrophones that were identified 
    from BQR-2a sonars but > cannot verify that. They are 45.5" long, the 
    rubber body 1.875" in > diameter, and 14.5 pounds. They are supposed 
    to have a stack of barium > titanate cylinders about 1.5" long and 
    about 1/8" wall thickness for > the active elements. I bought some of 
    these cylinders years ago from a > surplus electronics store. The 
    hydrophones were purchased probably > back in the 60s from DOD surplus 
    at Rough and Ready Island near > Stockton, CA. >  > 
    Attached is a pic. >  > I would like to test them before 
    offering them to the Psub community. > I have a HP 204C oscillator and 
    403B voltmeter. Any suggestions for a > test schematic? > 
     > Thanks, >  > Jim Rudholm
  
     
    Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. 
     
    
  No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - 
    www.avg.com  Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2630 - Release 
    Date: 01/18/10 07:35:00
 
   
   
  Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
  now. 
  
    
   No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - 
  www.avg.com  Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.150/2632 - Release 
  Date: 01/19/10 07:34:00
  
 |