Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE

["Captain Nemo" <vulcania@hawaii.rr.com>]

Herve,

Rejected, yes.  Censored from view if such a system exists?  No.

Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herve" <caribsub@coqui.net>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE


> Dont you think that soft ballast propane should be vigorously rejected for
> instance?
> Herve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carsten Standfuss" <MerlinSub@t-online.de>
> To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE
>
>
> > Its relative .. shown them - and display them - and explain whats is
> > going wrong with them.. Carsten
> >
> > Captain Nemo schrieb:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ray Keefer" <Ray.Keefer@Sun.COM>
> > > To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE
> > >
> > > >> > Also, I am vigorously opposed to the concept that any working
> homebuilt
> > > sub
> > > >> > not meeting someone else's personal criteria should be "banished
to
> the
> > > > > > cornfield".  That kind of censorship is just too dictatorial for
> me.
> > > >
> > > > Where did you get this idea?
> > >
> > > Ray,
> > >
> > > Read Carsten's statement of 6/25/02: where he says that subs not
meeting
> a
> > > given criteria "should not be displayed on the PSUBS picture
> gallery...or
> > > even on a convention."
> > >
> > > Pat
> >
> >
>