Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE

["Herve" <caribsub@coqui.net>]

Dont you think that soft ballast propane should be vigorously rejected for
instance?
Herve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carsten Standfuss" <MerlinSub@t-online.de>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE


> Its relative .. shown them - and display them - and explain whats is
> going wrong with them.. Carsten
>
> Captain Nemo schrieb:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ray Keefer" <Ray.Keefer@Sun.COM>
> > To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [PSUBS-MAILIST] SUBSAFE
> >
> > >> > Also, I am vigorously opposed to the concept that any working
homebuilt
> > sub
> > >> > not meeting someone else's personal criteria should be "banished to
the
> > > > > cornfield".  That kind of censorship is just too dictatorial for
me.
> > >
> > > Where did you get this idea?
> >
> > Ray,
> >
> > Read Carsten's statement of 6/25/02: where he says that subs not meeting
a
> > given criteria "should not be displayed on the PSUBS picture
gallery...or
> > even on a convention."
> >
> > Pat
>
>