----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:47
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Theory
Question
Steering. Hmmmm...Admittedly, I haven't
thought much about supercavitation because I don't deal with it. But you
raise an interesting point. I guess you could steer with thrust
vectoring, but then, as you say, what will happen to the shape of the bubble
when the sub changes direction? The closest analogy that come to mind at
this moment are airplane wings I've seen that were perforated with a zillion
little holes through which a portion of the engine exhaust was pumped.
They say it reduced drag somewhat, but the hard part was
maintenance: keeping all those little holes clean. I think if it were set up to distribute the gas envelope
properly along the hull, a supercavitation system could be made to work at all
angles and through a useful range of maneuvering. But like you, yeah
this is all way beyond me.
The closest I came to this kind of thing was a
project for a high speed sub: I have the hull and the 454 ratmotor
downstairs. But I decided to sack it for reasons Herve expressed: how
fast do I want to go when continually submerged in limited
visibility?
Pat
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:11
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Theory
Question
It seems anything having to do with
supercavitation is pretty dangerous. From some of the reading I did
another problem is with the steering of the projectile within the cavitation
bubble itself. The projectile can start banging around inside the
bubble along with some other issues. I'm really not big into going as
deep as possible anyway, reading about the pressures at depth make me
nervous. Being able to cruise around at 100 ft to watch the fish, or
race around in a bionic dolphin is more my cup of tea.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:59
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Theory
Question
James,
Somewhere in this thread, someone (you?)
wondered if a sub wrapped in a supercavitation bubble might be able to
operate at great depth without regard for pressure hull strength
considerations. I suppose in theory that's possible, depending on
whether or not one could generate a bubble of greater pressure than
would be encountered down deep. However, I don't think it would be
wise to rely on such a system, though; for the obvious reasons of what
would happen if it failed at greater than design collapse depth.
Whammo! Your barracuda becomes a flounder!
Pat
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:29
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Theory
Question
Oh I definitely understand that, I
don't imagine that anyone would want to travel that fast near anything
that would come even remotely close to the sub. I was just
wondering if the assumption that supercaviation = less hull
pressure was accurate.
James
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:16
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST]
Theory Question
Hi speed for underwater vehicles is
suitable only with enough deep waters and "room" around, there is no
way you can drive a mini sub at more than 10 m/h in shallow waters or
with reefs and obstacle. it s like driving a car in the fog. Even
with 100 Ft visibility once you SEE the obstacle the collision
is at 5 seconds, 5 sec to make a sharp turn or stop is
actually not easy at all. Add to that the momemtum of the
sub.
Herve