[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section
From: Rick Lucertini <empiricus@sprint.ca>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 22:45:39 -0700
References: <Roam2.0.6.928937115.17573.prize@trophy.eng.sun.com>

Ray Keefer wrote:

> [snip]
> Is the reactor still working? What would the Nuclear
> Reglatory Commission say if I park a nuclear sub in
> the San Francisco bay? A typhoon is a nuc boat, right?

A nuke it is.  I bought a model of one as a design aid.  It can be built out of flat
panels and single curve panels for the most part.

As for the nuke business: the NRC should have no problems with it.  If they let the
nuclear industry pass off a nuclear waste

Rick

--
Rick Lucertini
empiricus@sprint.ca
(Vancouver, Canada)
________________________

"Outside of a dog books are a man's best friend -
Inside of a dog there isn't enough light to read."

   Groucho Marx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section
  - From: Rick Lucertini <empiricus@sprint.ca>

References:
- Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section
  - From: Ray Keefer <Ray.Keefer@eng.Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section
Next by Date: Re: Very Expensive Thrills Dept., Soviet section
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread