[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments



Thanks,
clever, simple, cheap & does it all.
Alan
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

You have the norgren reg in the water and it will give 5 psi above ambient as it haws a hole which allows water pressure to the other side of the diaphragm..  It also has a relief valve built in.

 

 

 

From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Alan James
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 6:30 p.m.
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

 

Hi Hugh,

I  don't think I'm understanding this.

Are you saying attach the Norgren reg to the low pressure port of a first stage regulator via a hose

& then feed your motors 5psi air from the Norgren regulator. This would give the motor 5psi constant despite

the ambient pressure change.

Regards Alan

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Hugh Fulton

Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:21 PM

Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

 

Alan,

Get a Norgren plastic regulator and fit it to the downstream side of a scuba reg. That gives you a normal 150 psi supply to a standard reg.  you can dial up 5 psi easily.  I put in a SS spring.  Hugh

 

 

From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Alan James
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 4:59 p.m.
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

 

John,

Just tried some light springs in the first stage & running it off low pressure.

Even though the springs were very light it was developing more pressure than I wanted.

So very hard to get a fine adjustment with springs.

Am realizing that the fact this first stage just came back from servicing has a lot to do with things.

New O-rings throughout, & the operation was a bit stiff initially.

Tried again without the spring & off the low pressure. I got a flow without any pressure differential.

I was getting 1psi pressure in air then 2psi when the regulator was about a foot down in the water

column (bath tub).

I measured the pressure when running the springless first stage off high pressure & it was 11 psi.

From what I've gleaned from other posts this would be too much pressure.

I may continue with the springless first stage running off the low pressure but monitor it to make sure it

doesn't drop below ambient.

Alan 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Alan James

Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:38 PM

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

 

Hi John,

I connected the first stage without spring to another first stage fitted to the tank because if I ran my

springless first stage straight from the tank then that tank would be solely dedicated to the equalization of

the motors, or hull if I went that way. I only have two tanks & it's a bit of a safety feature that I've incorporated

to have them both running my life support either together or separately.

Also I can play around with the level of the regulator in the water column in relation to the height of the motors

by having it separate from the tank.

When testing I didn't put the hose running from the reg in the water. I just lowered the 1st stage a couple of

feet in the water to create a pressure differential. But as said very poor flow off the low pressure.

Yes I remember Karl saying he let the over pressure bubble out the seals on the way up.

Also remember someone commenting recently that having a balanced pressure across the seals was a lot kinder

on them, however I would rather ere on the side of having air bubble out the seals than water coming in.

Am hunting down some light springs for the first stage to try & get a slight over pressure off the low pressure feed.

I also want to try oil compensating the motors with the ambient pressure coming from a regulator.

So further experimentation required.

Regards Alan

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Jon Wallace

Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:41 AM

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air compensation experiments

 

Alan,

Why did you have the first stage without spring connected to the low pressure side of a separate normal first stage?  I think you can accomplish air compensation with only the single first stage with no spring.  I also think you need to have the compensation hose connected to something that will contain the pressure as opposed to just putting the hose in water as it sounds like you did.  Without a sealed end you end up with the same amount of pressure on both sides of the first stage piston (assuming a piston arrangement) which I think would lead to the high pressure valve inside the first stage opening indiscriminately.  Back pressure is required.

Somewhere along the way, I don't recall if it was when I talked to Karl at UI, or maybe what I read on this list, Karl has no pressure release valve on his motors but just lets the air bleed out through the motor housing seals when it is strong enough to do so.  That insinuates the motors are always under some amount of positive pressure above ambient providing the back pressure needed to seal the high pressure valve and keep air from bleeding out.

Jon


On 2/14/2012 2:41 AM, Alan James wrote:

Hi all

I posted a little while back about Karl's system of air compensating his motors using a

first stage regulator with the spring removed.

I had a system made up whereby I could run my first stage without spring from a low pressure hose

connected to the low pressure port of a 1st stage on the tank. I was thinking of using this system to

equalize an ambient sub hence the desire to run it off the low pressure port.

All right in theory but when I stuck the regulator under the water there was very little air coming out.

To make matters worse the air still came out when the 1st stage was taken from the water.

I then ran the system off high pressure, & the air came out before the reg had descended in to the water column.

I could stop the flow easy enough with a finger; so a bit of back pressure would control it.

The conclusion to date is that it isn't as sensitive as a 2nd stage regulator.

Am going to source some light springs & hopefully develop a slight pressure above ambient off the low pressure port.

Hope this makes sense.

Regards Alan

 

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6884 (20120214) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6884 (20120214) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6884 (20120214) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6884 (20120214) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com