Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] RFC - Standard Thru-Hull Electrical Connector

["Daniel Lance" <lanceind@earthlink.net>]

Jon,
I make a motion that we adopt the Subconn BH4F as a Pusbs standard.   
Dan Lance


> [Original Message]
> From: Jon Wallace <jonw@psubs.org>
> To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> Date: 12/21/2009 9:42:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] RFC - Standard Thru-Hull Electrical Connector
>
>
> Yes, we do.  This topic is forking into various discussions which is 
> fogging the original intent of the bulkhead connector RFC.
>
> The digikey connectors are not associated with the bulkhead connector 
> but with the OTS hardware.  The digikey connectors were suggested 
> because they were a direct fit for the OTS hardware on ONE END.  You 
> still have to connect "wires" (not a digikey connector) to any bulkhead 
> unit you purchase or fabricate.  If there is an intent to "standardize" 
> the use of digikey connectors for OTS hardware, please create an RFC ( 
> http://www.psubs.org/guidelines/PSUBS/psubs_guideline_form.txt ) so we 
> can both document it and track it under a different email heading.  Send 
> the form to me so I can add it to the RFC database and forward to the
group.
>
> OTS is discussed in these varied topics only because one or more members 
> already own that brand of equipment and have offered to let others use 
> it at the 2010 convention.  Going through this whole exercise for the 
> sake of borrowing someone else's equipment for a once a year convention 
> seems to me not to be a good investment.  Standardizing on a bulkhead 
> connector with a defined pin-out which can be use for borrowing someones 
> OTS equipment once a year AND having that same bulkhead available for 
> other equipment the rest of the year, outside the convention, in your 
> everyday use of your submersible, seems like a very good investment to me.
>
> While underwater comms for the 2010 convention is currently driving this 
> discussion and RFC, we need to be cognizant that it represents only one 
> purpose for standardizing on a bulkhead connector and should not be 
> viewed in isolation.  Standardizing on a bulkhead connector does not 
> prevent anyone who still wants to fabricate their own from doing so.  
> However, it does provide those who want a commercial solution with an 
> off-the-shelf, easy-to-purchase item; that if wired correctly will 
> conform to and work properly with any interchangeable equipment we 
> develop down the road designed for that bulkhead connector.
>
> In time, we may certainly have more than one bulkhead connector defined 
> for other uses (6 pin, 10pin, etc) but this is a good place to start.  
> Subconn has expressed a sincere interest to work with our members 
> (unlike OTS) and already offered a respectable discount which I believe 
> we will see increased.  The fact that a bulkhead connector can be 
> home-built does not preclude standardizing on a commercial unit.
>
> Let's move forward and get this connector standardized.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
> Smyth, Alec wrote:
> > So, is there still any interest in a standard bulkhead connector? My 
> > main rationale for it was to connect OTS cables on any sub, but it 
> > seems like with the cheap Digi-Key source of OTS connectors it isn't 
> > needed anymore as everyone can make a cable set adapted to whatever 
> > bulkhead connector they are using.
> >
> > It would still be nice to standardize for other reasons, but no longer 
> > necessary.
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> ************************************************************************
> ************************************************************************
> The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
> CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
> because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
> from our organization.
>
> If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
> link below or send a blank email message to:
> 	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>
> Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
> automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
> our server receiving your request.
>
> PSUBS.ORG
> PO Box 53
> Weare, NH  03281
> 603-529-1100
> ************************************************************************
> ************************************************************************
> ************************************************************************





************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************