you develop the fusion reactor and I will work on developing light weight
balsa lead to shield it, thus keeping our subs vertically bi-directional.
Yes, the psub mail list, and web page are great and I too hope this does
not change. The only thing I would like to see is more postings on
the psub webpage of supplier sources and info on some item or equipment that was
tried and either worked or not. building these things is costly and I hate
buying some widget only to find out that a gadget works much better. the way Jon
has it broken down into categories allows you to target your search without
going through a couple hundred unrelated emails and that's my 2 cents. Oh yea
keep us posted on your computer control system it sounds interesting.
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:18
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Open
Discussion's Allowed in PSUB's Mailing List
Sorry I am a little behind with my e-mail but just have
to put in my 2 cents worth here.
Brent and all I am a newbie extrordinair. I am demanding my
money back from the UofM for all those math classes.
I think the way this forum is run is outstanding. For
safety reasons no one should be building a submarine
of any kind without understanding everything that it involves.
This knowledge should not be handed out and just used by
anyone. Lives are a stake here. At the very least anyone
considering building or even buying one should at least
go through the ABS and , Archives, and any other reference
materials before anything.
You first have to understand the question, before you
can understand the answers.
I am one that is always trying to find a better way, but
then again I have grand babies that need me around for
awhile.
Lets just get back to subs and keep things as they are
all this other stuff does not belong, If some want to go
another route fine do it. But lets leave this as is.
And just to keep my post in order and sub discussion
I am thinking on a Hydrogen 3 fusion power reactor
If I figure it out will share
Dean Ackman
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.