[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Contingency Planning Presentation



Doug,

I would appreciate your input and look forward to further information.

 

Something that I didn’t put here and not sure if it fits, while in the Navy we would regularly run simulated causalities and each member of the watch would walk through their response relating their actions and what they expected would expect to see.  I made the observation at the time and it has since been supported by a number of other persons that even though you were running a simulation, things seemed to breakdown in reality more during this time frame than others…the systems were not being stressed as part of the simulation.  I have no correlation as to why this seems to occur during the sims.

R/Jay

 

 

Respectfully,

Jay K. Jeffries

Andros Is., Bahamas

 

A skimmer afloat is but a submarine, so poorly built it will not plunge.

 

From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of sealordone@aol.com
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:15 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Contingency Planning Presentation

 

Jay,

 

For the last few years my group at the FAA has been sponsoring a line of human factors research on how (major airline) pilots deal with unexpected events in flight.  What do you do when something totally off-the-wall happens to you?  How does the average pilot react, and how should the pilot react?

 

This might have a place at the very end of your presentation.  First you cover the predictable contingencies, then a little piece on unpredicted contingencies.  I will send you something.

 

Doug Farrow