I have changed the design using three 
cylindrical masses one is the press hull 
illustrated as 100% size of hull I have yet to determine. the main tanks are made of little less than half of a pipe that is 75% the size of the hull. These are 
ambient press tanks with drains on the bottom and vents at the top that serve as both vent and air inlet for blowing tanks. the bottom tank is 1 
ATM. it is half of a pipe that is 50% the size of the main hull. the drain on the bottom of the tank has a valve for closing after trim has been adjusted. the top valve is also like the main tank and serves as both a vent and air inlet 
source. Both main and trim tanks are 
divided on both sides. Will this be 
sufficient to keep the sub from turning on end from moving water and air when changing angle of sub using dive planes while driving? this sub will be designed to 
cruise under its own power most of the time on using a 
series of deep cycle marine batteries. four for the drive sys and two for 
acc. by running two or one at a time will give me an idea of point of no return for drive system. before the first set become depleted just simply turn back and head to the dock. with a total of six batteries I am wondering if that will be too much weight? I was planning on a 36" press hull at a 10' or 12' length.  After asking the question on  rectangular  
view ports  I realized the err in my thinking. as the press would not be evenly displaced  and would be focuses on the center of the view port. which brings me to ask, where can I get acrylic that thick and how much does it run. are there a!
 ny conta
cts for making larger ones on a budget and how thick does one need to be for a 12" diameter view for the front? I know this is much to ask on one sitting but I will lay it out into an outline form next time.
Thanks much for the help Guys,
Chad Beller
East Tx
Hi, Chad - trim tanks need to be hard.  
Ambient tanks will allow any entrained air to be compressed and you'll lose/gain 
buoyancy like a dive vest/wet or dry suit.
 
If the rectangular view ports are for a surface 
sail (ambient) they're fine.  U/W put at least some simple curvature 
in them to resist water pressure.  Even then you'd need very thick plexi 
and no sharp corners.  Shallow depths you might get away with it.  The 
challenge here is pressure distribution across the window area.
 
Experiment with a few test runs of a cockpit 
only.  Ballast the cockpit and throw it into the salt chuck.  Better 
yet, dive down with it or have diving buddies observe it for you.  
Empiricism goes a long way.
 
Cheers
Rick L
Vancouver
  
----- Original Message ----- 
  
  
  
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:55 
  AM
  
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] new hull 
  design
  
  
so are you saying use the ambiant tank for trim. I was thinking four trim 
  tanks and four four surface tanks that way I can trim at four points before 
  the dive to obtain neutral bouyancy and ballance the boat out. as for the 
  piping I was trying to do away with alot of external piping. not for any real 
  resone other than I don't want a bunch of external lines and pipes. I'm not 
  sure what you mean about deviding the two systems? the trim tanks will have a 
  drain valve that can be closed and the main surface tanks will vent out the 
  bottom. air will be inroduced to the tanks from the top of each. once the trim 
  tanks are set for the load the drain valve is closed and to surface all that 
  is needed is to fill or flood the main tanks to surface and dive. I was 
  attemting to streamline the boat also making it opperate more like an attack 
  sub with dive planes and a joystick control for the rear rudders so as to 
  operate like a sport sub or aircraft controls. here is a concept of line ! 
  placement. and your oppinion on rectangular view ports would be? also is a 
  concept drawing for an earlier design based on the flying sub. the top one was 
  a weight trim design and the bottom one is a trim tank design. of coarse the 
  tanks would have to be changed top to bottom but I have abandoned this idea 
  for the other. 
thankfully yours,
Chad Beller
east 
  tx
 
  
 
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: poulin.carrier@videotron.ca
To: 
  personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Sent: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 6:25 AM
Subject: 
  Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] new hull design
  
  
Hello unnammed stranger,
  
 
  
A normal ballast system have 2 systems (like 
  yours) exept that one system is ambient (for surface) and the other system is 
  1atm (trim) so, as you said, the boyancy won't change as you go 
  deeper.
  
 
  
When I look at your system I don't see why you 
  devide your 2 systems since they will work the same way. I think it would work 
  the same if you only had 1 ambient system.
  
 
  
I also don't see how it could be simplier for the 
  piping.
  
 
  
Pierre Poulin
  
 
  
    
----- 
    Original Message ----- 
    
    
    
Sent: 
    Monday, September 04, 2006 2:42 AM
    
Subject: 
    [PSUBS-MAILIST] new hull design
    
all this talk about getting back to subs but everyone still 
    seems to be arguing over issues. I was waiting for a fist fight at the end 
    of this pissing contest then we can all hose the testosterone off the decks 
    and go on eh. I'm just a newbie so don't mind my little joke. I did have 
    some ques regarding a new design I am trying to come up with to minimize 
    exterior piping and make lines and valving simpler inside the hull. my trim 
    tanks will be a closed sys and I am not sure if this is necicary or not. I 
    was concerned with the air in my trim tanks loosing mass as I drive 
    deeper  if I leave them ambiant which would cause my sub to become neg 
    boyant at depth. The other concern is that if the trim tanks are a closed 
    sys is the wall seperating the main tanks from the trim tanks need to be 
    reinforced? as for the other ques that I have had earlier I found a place I 
    should have known to look for affordable  parts and sealed rotating 
    assemblies. grainger.com has ! a wide variety of parts for those interested 
    in looking. they also have a few co2 and o2 meters avalible and a wide 
    variety of hydrolic as well as peunamatic parts for fabrication.
    
    
any 
    thoughts on rectangular port view holes instead of round.