Rectagular ports are A. Harder to find a supplier
for the lense, B. The lense tends to chip/crack or give in the
corners.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 2:42
AM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] new hull
design
all this talk about getting back to subs but everyone still
seems to be arguing over issues. I was waiting for a fist fight at the end of
this pissing contest then we can all hose the testosterone off the decks and
go on eh. I'm just a newbie so don't mind my little joke. I did have some ques
regarding a new design I am trying to come up with to minimize exterior piping
and make lines and valving simpler inside the hull. my trim tanks will be a
closed sys and I am not sure if this is necicary or not. I was concerned with
the air in my trim tanks loosing mass as I drive deeper if I leave them
ambiant which would cause my sub to become neg boyant at depth. The other
concern is that if the trim tanks are a closed sys is the wall seperating the
main tanks from the trim tanks need to be reinforced? as for the other ques
that I have had earlier I found a place I should have known to look for
affordable parts and sealed rotating assemblies. grainger.com has ! a
wide variety of parts for those interested in looking. they also have a few
co2 and o2 meters avalible and a wide variety of hydrolic as well as
peunamatic parts for fabrication.
any
thoughts on rectangular port view holes instead of round.
|