| 
 What if you had a large surface vessel that had a 
large volume of air, say just a simple cylinder, like 6' in dia by 20' 
long.  That would give you quite a bit of floatation.  But if you 
tried to go submerged with that you would be having to move a very large mass 
underwater.  But what if you opened the ends of the cylinder wide open and 
ran propultion through that space, then that space would not really be a 
displacment factor.  The only dispacement would be just the rim 
of the cylinder.   Turning might create problems but you might be able 
to get around that somehow.  
  
This might be a way to cheat your displacement of a 
large surface vessel with out paying the price for the large mass under 
water.  The devil would be in the details. 
  
My 2 cents 
  
Brian 
  
  
----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 
  15:55 
  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] 
  "Frankenboot" 
  
  
  
  Paul, 
  
  Yes, I found Dougs site some time ago, there's some pretty inspirational 
  stuff in there. It is all part of why I believe this to be possible.  
  And yes, the WWII boats have a shape that is much more practical for me 
  than my original idea and I don't need a double hull per see for the ambient. 
  Imagine a forward bow tank that could double as a vee berth! Large volume, 
  dual use, well baffled, waterproof roll up mats stowed for divening. Fleet 
  boat or U-boat, builders choice. 
  Is it doable? I don't know yet. I recently discovered the 444 cf hp 
  cylinder, kinda puts a little different spin on things. Long narrow shape for 
  a hull?, small compensated airspace for machinery?, four of those 
  444's?, money, time, effort...what precisely is possible? 
  Even though I had found it, thanks so much for the link Paul. 
  Joe
 
   
  
  
     
    From:  Paul Kreemer 
    <paulkreemer@gmail.com> Reply-To:  personal_submersibles@psubs.org To:  personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject:  Re: 
    [PSUBS-MAILIST] "Frankenboot" Date:  Mon, 14 Nov 2005 
    14:44:00 -0800 
     Boy I think I'd look at Doug Jackson's http://www.submarineboat.com 
    website first for comparisons.  He's building a dry ambient 
    where 
    most of the SportSub's are wet ambient.  Doug has a large 
    surface 
    cockpit/rear deck area which obviously floods when underwater but 
    which 
    provides a nice seating and cargo area while surfaced.   
     
    Doug's design looks different from most any other sub, and 
    different 
    from Joe's WWII look, but I think it has some great practical 
    ideas and 
    more similarities to what Joe is describing. 
     
    Paul
  
    
    
    Rick, 
    
    This sub uses the main cabin as ballast tank http://www.ivccorp.com/ 
    
    Here is proper use of the other suggestion http://pbskids.org/sesame/ernie/index.html 
    
    
    Thanks :) 
    
    Joe
  
     
    
     
  
  
  
   ************************************************************************ 
  ************************************************************************ 
  ************************************************************************ The 
  personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal CAN-SPAM Act 
  of 2003. Your email address appears in our database because either you, or 
  someone you know, requested you receive messages from our organization. If you 
  want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the link below or 
  send a blank email message to: removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
  Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an automated 
  process and should be complete within five minutes of our server receiving 
  your request. PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH 03281 603-529-1100 
  ************************************************************************ 
  ************************************************************************ 
  ************************************************************************ 
 
 |