[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] THE CASE OF THE MISSING OXYGEN.



Sorry about that, been moving.
Carl


Akins wrote:
Hi Carl.
 
I DO listen to Phil. What makes you think I don't? >From reading Phil's website and seeing his credentials I would be crazy if I didn't.
 
You are a bit late responding to this message that came out two weeks ago. I think you missed the point. No one was saying Phil was not right about vacuums forming in a sealed battery pod when using hydrocaps. I certainly believe him.
 
We were simply trying to find out WHY that vacuum occurs. Besides if the 02 bonds and becomes p0 02 as Stan suspects, then it could not be vented as you suggest since it would be lead oxide. So I don't know what you were referring to there.
 
There were several more messages regarding this with Stan apologizing for being kurt and asking me to post if and when I found out where the 02 went from the hydrocap action.
 
Also I believe it DOES matter where the 02 goes from the hydrocap action. If we knew that we would understand WHY the vacuum forms. So for knowledge sake it DOES matter where it's going. Don't you want to know WHY things occur so
 
you may better understand your sub?
 
You missed the point here Carl. No one was trying to prove Phil wrong
 
WHERE WERE YOU TWO WEEKS AGO? Lol.
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: C.Kem
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] THE CASE OF THE MISSING OXYGEN.

I don't it really matters where it's going.  It's not recoverable and should be vented, O2 or H.  This has been debated for as long as I can remember and I forget how long I've been a member here.  Phil's right, regardless.  So until someone can prove him wrong, maybe it's about time we started listening to him.
Carl


Akins wrote:
Hi Stan.
 
I care Stan. To increase my knowledge. I'm sorry if I bored you with trying to find out where the (seperated from the hydrogen) oxygen went to, if it bonded, and why it is missing, so I won't mention
 
it again after today nor post here when I find out where the original oxygen went for my own edification so you won't think I'm obsessing. I think obsessing might be a necessary thing
 
on building a sub what with all the many small details and questions to overcome. If I wasn't obsessed I would probably have never started or given up on the project by now.
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] THE CASE OF THE MISSING OXYGEN.

Ok Bill, obsess all you want, but it's become a bore.  Get off it.  Focus on something meaningful.  I doubt anybody's wading through your verbage anymore.  Who cares?
 
In a message dated 2/4/2005 3:25:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, lakins1@tampabay.rr.com writes:
Prelude....
 
Scotland yard was baffled and had not found out where the missing original oxygen had gone to in the totally sealed room.
 
Sherlock Bill was playing his minnkota violin and smoking his pipe while deeply in thought with his knitted brow showing the strain of days of pondering this one question.
For days now this one question had nagged at him as Dr. Stan Watson
had tried to help Sherlock Bill figure out where the orignal room oxygen had gone. Thus far they were not sure what had
happened to the oxygen in the room that Lady Rutherford had died in. The doors were sealed both air and water tight.
No one had entered the room and taken the original oxygen from the room. Dr Stan Watson thought that perhaps the
oxygen had been bonded to and absorbed by something in the room but that was just a guess and as yet he wasn't sure of that.
 
Odd bodkins! Where did the ORIGINAL oxygen get to? Could it possibly be that fiendish Dr. Moriarty had stolen the original oxygen somehow?
 
Zounds! The game's afoot!  
 
THE CASE OF: THE MISSING ORIGINAL OXYGEN SEPERATED FROM THE HYDROGEN IN THE BATTERY POD.
 
Hi Vance.
 
Yes, I understand and grasp exactly what  you said in your below posting.
 
I understand that if the original oxygen that seperated from the hydrogen is missing, then the ambient oxygen in your pod will take up the slack and combine with the hydrogen and form water and this
 
will reduce the ambient oxygen in your pod and therefore produce a vacuum.  
 
I totally understand that. 
 
But what I do not understand is WHERE DID THE ORIGINAL OXYGEN
 
THAT ORIGINALLY SEPERATED FROM THE HYDROGEN GO TO? WHY DOES THE AMBIENT OXYGEN IN THE POD HAVE TO REPLACE THE ORIGINAL
 
OXYGEN THAT SEPERATED FROM THE HYDROGEN IN THE FIRST PLACE UNLESS THAT ORIGINAL OXYGEN IS MISSING?
 
 
 
The 64 dollar question here for me is.....WHERE DID THE OXYGEN THAT ORIGINALLY SEPERATED FROM THE HYDROGEN GO, SO THAT OTHER AMBIENT
 
OXYGEN IN THE POD NOW HAS TO TAKE THE PLACE OF THAT ORIGINAL OXYGEN SO THAT WATER CAN BE REFORMED BY THE HYDROCAPS?
 
BECAUSE IF THE ORIGINAL SEPERATED OXYGEN WAS NOT MISSING AND WAS PRESENT AND REFORMED WITH THE ORIGINAL HYDROGEN THAT IT ORIGINALLY
 
SEPERATED FROM, THEN THERE WOULDN'T BE A LOSS OF VOLUME, SO THIS ORIGNAL SEPERATED OXYGEN MUST BE MISSING RIGHT?
 
 
Stan says he thinks the ORIGINAL oxygen that seperated from the hydrogen might be missing because it bonded with something and became an oxide or something.
 
Is this what has happened to the original oxygen that seperated from the hydrogen? If not, where did it go?
 
Stan has his suspicions that the originally seperated oxygen MIGHT have bonded with something to become an oxide or something, but thus far no one has definatively and specifically answered this yet.
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.