The only real difference is the point of reference for
the sensors. You would want an absolute sensor for
sensing depth/pressure for a sub. Gauge often means
the same thing as absolute, differential will have two
sensor inputs and read the difference between the two.
Try the datasheets for the sensor you are interested
in. Usually the datasheet will have some standard
interface circuits and information. Also, get TI
application notes book for the MSP430...Even if you
are
using any MCU. It has great circuits and algorithms
for reading various common sensors.
Warren.
normaly means that there will be t
--- steve <steve@kobol.worldonline.co.uk> wrote:
another question on the subject if i may.
i have heard there are three different types of
sensor available: absolute,
differential and gauge.
i have an idea what the differential type does but
what about the other two?
what should i be looking for to get a linear 0 - 5v
or 0 - 10v output i can
feed to an A to D converter?
Best Regards
Steve Bosworth
UK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Mills" <cirtemoeg@juno.com>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Water depth sensing?
Steve, here are a few links that I recall.
http://members.cox.net/igalysh/pressure.html
http://www.parallax.com/html_pages/resources/custapps/app_underwater.asp
I have many more sources, but the case and hinge
on my laptop cracked a
few
months ago [ no video ] so I'm starting over with
the searches/sources
[and
everything else ! ]
When I come across anything significant I'll post
it.
--Steve
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:16:40 -0000 "steve"
<steve@kobol.worldonline.co.uk> writes:
anything helps, thanks.
i had originally considered the low tech
approach but as the project
progresses i keep moving the boundaries. in one
way i actually know
it
could be done visually but where is the
challenge?
steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Secor" <wreckdiver@usadatanet.net>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Water depth
sensing?
Steve,
I'm using a pressure sensor from Digikey
(www.digikey.com) for my
rebreather
controller which uses a PIC processor. Mine is
a 0-250 psi sensor
which
will
measure down to about 600 feet but you can get
them that measure
0-100
psi.
The particular sensor I'm using is a
Measurement Specialties
2000519. It
has a .5-4.5v ratiometric output voltage and
runs on 5 vdc and a
1/4" NPT
pressure port. The downside is they are
somewhat pricey....about
$100.00.
Hope this helps....Al
Al Secor ARS: WA3PWX Scuba Instructor SSI
PDIC TDI
http://www.geocities.com/SubDiverI
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve" <steve@kobol.worldonline.co.uk>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Water depth
sensing?
Hi All
Unfortunately there is still no sign of the
Kitteridge book but
i expect
the
US / UK post offices are taking their time.
maybe they read
everything
they
send???
As part of my ROV project i want to look at
a way of measuring
the depth
of
my vehicle. I am toying with a Basic stamp
2 at the moment and
wondered
if
anyone had any ideas for a small (i.e.
cheap) sensor that i
could use
for
this purpose.
My design spec will only need to measure
down to 20m in fresh or
sea
water.
anybody got any useful ideas and know where
i could source one?
Best Regards
Steve Bosworth
UK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dewey Mason" <drmason2001@yahoo.com>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] test of CO2
safety hardware - any
volunteers?
If tested well, and found to work, this
could serve as
a backup unit to a commercial device, or
even just as
a novelty, but I agree in should be looked
into. My 2
cents.
Dewey
--- Pierre Poulin <pipo305@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Erik,
I will try it. I just need some time. I
will try it
mainly for curiousity
and discution. I think that's all this
group is all
about! To get new things
developed and discussed.
Pierre Poulin
From: Erik Muller <emuller@naic.edu>
Reply-To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] test of
CO2 safety
hardware - any volunteers?
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:23:52 -0400
Gail,
Many of the points you made are true.
Let me
address them one at a time:
I'm wondering how accurate and useful
a device
like the one you describe
would be.
Indeed, as am I. This is why I am
calling for
people with air-tight hulls
to test the system. I am not suggesting
that it be
implemented on anyones
machine before testing its efficiency
and it is
developed.
With reliable professionally-made
devices
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools