Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] OSS

["Pierre Poulin" <pipo305@hotmail.com>]

No DXF!!! 2D only!

DWG or SAT for 3D (volume, mass info)

Pierre






>From: "Warrend Greenway" <dub@linuxmail.org>
>Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] OSS
>Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:31:52 +0800
>
>OK. You have a lot of opinions. :) Ready to help compile that list of those 
>interested
>and the skills they bring to the table? A landlubber is perfectly suited. 
>Furthermore,
>you seem to grasp the situation perfectly. I don't think we need to worry 
>about a new
>server at this point, but I have a server I would offer to the cause if it 
>ever got to
>that point. What I would like to see is everyone who has expressed interest 
>to either
>post their wish-list or e-mail them to myself or you...:) So we can compile 
>a preliminary
>spec. It will probably change a bit as time goes on, but it will give us a 
>place to start!
>Please, all, spec the following:
>1. Length
>2. Diameter
>3. Speed
>4. Range or dive time
>5. Safe dive depth
>6. Cost window
>7. Further comments
>
>It seems like lead acid is the power source of choice. I can handle a PWM 
>speed control,
>so I don't think we need to worry about potentiometers or anything like 
>that. Batteries
>and motor should probably be stored outside the pressure hull. Steel seems 
>to be the
>pressure hull material of choice. Gauges and electronics should be left 
>flexible, to
>accomodate a variety of tastes, needs, and budgets.
>
>Let's agree to use DXF for electronic drawings and TXT or HTML for text.
>
>Warren.
>warrend@decagon.com
>
>
> > Good Evening all,
> >
> > I just read all the posts since this morning... wow!  You've been busy.
> >
> > OK... here goes.  Carsten had some good points.  I think if I spent
> > hours on end burning the midnite oil and then saw that somebody was
> > selling the plans in the back of Popular Mechanics... and getting rich,
> > I'd be furious.
> >
> > Now... open source does not necessarily mean the project could not be
> > turned to profit making.  There are lots of people making money from
> > Linux, after all.  I also wonder how we might control anyone who did
> > decide to take the OSS design and start building and selling it...
> > copyleft documents would not do.... as such documents do in fact allow
> > one to reproduce and sell it.  We need rather, a patent on any
> > intelectual property in the design to do this.
> >
> > I think that the best way to control commercial use of the project would
> > be to design it such that it would not be commercially viable.  I.e.: a
> > one person submersible could never be used to "give rides", and the
> > potential market for such a machine would be negligible.  Liability
> > would kill it before the first dozen had hit the water.
> >
> > The other thing is that it should be stressed concept only.  The idea
> > would be for people to build their own machines to the specifications in
> > the project documents... not for anyone to try to market a kit to be
> > assembled.
> >
> > If we produce the plans and the documentation... this material could and
> > most certainly would be copyrighted.  It could be distributed free of
> > charge in electronic form.  Just the fact that we would be giving it
> > away free would discourage competition.
> >
> > A separate list with url... well, it certainly could be done, but how
> > big a monster is this going to become?  Do we need a new list?  Do we
> > need a new server... possibly with a forum?  Right now this is all new
> > and exciting... like the new girl in school... but the early interest
> > may fade as the drudgery hits.
> >
> > A camel has been described as a horse designed by comittee... but then,
> > a camel is a pretty impressive piece of technology.  Even though God
> > likely did not consult a comittee upon finalizing the two or three
> > designs, the concept is still valid.  I think that this would function
> > best if somebody would take charge and start assigning tasks as soon as
> > possible.
> >
> > We perhaps need to compile a list of who is interested.  We could easily
> > form our own mail list and take it off the psub list... but you know
> > what?  I suspect that even those not participating would find the
> > project of interest and it would be a simple matter to set filters up to
> > shunt anything with "OSS" in the subject line to a specific location.
> >
> > A wish list might be one of the first things to be enumerated... just as
> > soon as we know who we are.
> >
> > This could work.  For some reason I don't understand, there seems to be
> > quite a bit of commeradery here... and little or no bickering.
> >
> > OK, enough from the landlubber.  I've already put out my "wish list" and
> > mentioned how I think I might be able to help.  I'm going to sit back
> > and watch until somebody tells me to go out and get an original copy of
> > the plans for Trieste or something.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dale A. Raby
> > Editor/Publisher
> > The Green Bay Web
> > http://www.thegreenbayweb.com
><< dalesignature.gif >>
>
>--
>______________________________________________
>http://www.linuxmail.org/
>Now with POP3/IMAP access for only US$19.95/yr
>
>Powered by Outblaze


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis ! 
http://www.msn.fr/msger/default.asp