Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] nuclear psub?

[Doc <doc@bionicdolphin.com>]

Interesting thread guys, but why would terrorist go through the risk and hassle and expense
of building a nuke when they've been so successful using box cutters, rubber dinghies and fertilizer?
Paranoia is terrorism's best weapon!

How about a quicklime and seawater powered sub?

Anybody got a BINGO yet?

Doc



Coalbunny wrote:

> Exactly Nero.  Scary part is that it really is THAT simple to make fuel
> for a nuke weapon.
> Carl
>
> > Nero Wolfe wrote:
> >
> > I was at the University of Chicago today and i saw the monument to
> > enrico firmi's CP-1.  Chicago Pile 1 was a big pile of graphite and
> > unenriched uranium...  Litterally a pile.  This got me thinking...
> > A reactor is disturbingly simple.  I think you know where I'm going on
> > this....  The technology is simpler than cartsens boat...
>
> --
> "You delight not in a city's seven or seventy wonders, but in an answer
> it gives to a question of yours, or the question it asks you, forcing
> you to answer, like Thebes through the mouth of the Sphinx." -- Kublai
> Khan