Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] PSub convention 2001

[Ray Keefer <Ray.Keefer@west.sun.com>]

Hi,

I think it is a great idea also. I really don't want to mess with the
added complexity for the first Convention. Let's just get it
going before we get too complex. Those who want to go diving can
go a day early or on Sunday.

I was thinking that the second convention should be in Florida
where the weather is warm most of the year and water is very
clear.

>From then on just alternate between Vancouver and Florida.
Odd years in Vancouver and even years Florida.

Regards,
Ray


> From: "Sean T. Stevenson" <ststev@uniserve.com>
> To: "personal_submersibles@psubs.org" <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 19:18:12 -0700
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] PSub convention 2001
> 
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:37:40 -0700, Ty Alley wrote:
> 
> >I think the dive idea is great.  Maybe it could be in conjunction with a sub
> >dive that way we could all drop down to about sixty feet and watch the subs
> >do their thing.  It would give us guys that don't have subs yet or that
> >couldn't bring 'em a chance to take part in the dive.  I couldn't imagine
> >anything cooler than to be diving and seeing a bunch of subs go by!  Count
> >the Louisiana guy in.
> >Ty
> 
> If this is the case, we'd be better off holding the convention in the
> winter.  Summer around here means poor water visibility.
> 
> -Sean
> 
>