[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Batteries Bank



I fully agree with Cliff. Small subs that aren’t designed for great depth and have relatively light hulls usually need ballast weight anyway. The most important thing that I look for is a battery type that is less likely to release gas. The old sub uses Deka gel golf cart batteries and the new sub has SeaBatteries from deep sea power. I’m no expert on Lithium, but I have heard that they can explode on contact with water.

Has any one else heard that?

 

Greg Cottrell

Project Manager

 

 

greg@precisionplastics.com

http://www.precisionplastics.com

 

P please consider the environment before printing this email


From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Cliff Redus
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 12:46 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Batteries Bank

 

Based on the experience with my boat, I think AGM's are the way to go. If I built a new boat, I would use these.   As a point of comparison, I can give you my experience with AGM batteries for a psub application. 

 

I purchased 10 Lifeline Gp-2700T batteries about five years ago. These are 12V batteries rated at 100Ahr.  They weigh 63lbs each.  I operate my battery bank at 120 VDC. During the build phase of the boat,  these were periodically top off with a dedicated 120 VDC battery charger that was setup for these particular batteries.  Over the  years, I have recharged these approximately 250 times.  The initial cost of the batteries was $160 and the current cost is about $280 each.  Over the five years, I have never, not one time smelled any off gassing during a charge cycle.  I have never had any leaked battery fluid.  I had to replace one of the batteries because I dropped it while removing it and riped a hole in the side.  Even  then, it still did not leak.  Now that I am in an operational mode on the boat, I noticed that the battery life was not as long as when they were new.  To analyze this, I built a poor mans battery tester which consisted of a 1200 Watt inverter that was connected to a bank of incandescent light bulbs with a light dimmer switch so that I could adjust load.  I tested each of the 10 batteries  against a 10 amp load and compared how long it took for them to  drop below 11 volts.   Compared to the data published by the manufacturer, these batteries tested between 40 and 70% of their initial capacity. The bottom line is it is time to replace the battery bank. 

 

To me, one of the major arguments for using lithium batteries is they have a better power density (power to weight ratio).  While this is important for a car, to me it is not as important for a psub as most of the time, we have to add ballast anyway to submerge.  So using a less expensive battery that provides both power a ballast makes more sense to me.  While they are inexpensive, conventional lead-acid car batteries leak acid and off gas while charging.  As such, to me a good compromise  is AGM.

 

Cliff


Cliff Redus
Redus Engineering
USA Office: 830-663-6445
USA mobile: 830-931-1280
cliffordredus@sbcglobal.com

 

 


From: Jon Wallace <jonw@psubs.org>
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 9:22:22 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Batteries Bank


The electrical requirements to fulfill the operating parameters of cars and subs are different enough I think, that the greater reserve capacity of Lithium is not enough to justify the added expense.  It would be interesting to hear how many psubbers have found that lead/acid does not adequately serve their needs and would move to lithium if they could.  Some time ago (in a different lead vs (?) battery discussion) Phil Nuytten advised that from his experience lead/acid provided the best "bang for the buck" for home-builders.  The US Battery Rep that we had as a guest in July talked about all battery types and seemed to confirm that for all its supposed weaknesses, the good ole lead/acid battery was the way to go.  That was my impression at least.

Jon




************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
    removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************