Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] The last dance by David Bartsch

[Marc de Piolenc <piolenc@archivale.com>]

I tend to agree with you - not on the grounds of detectability, but 
simply because a nuclear powerplant sets a lower limit to size, and to 
cost, that isn't there with diesel. You can build more, and smaller, 
diesel boats for the same money.

Marc

On 4/15/2010 3:41 PM, David Bartsch wrote:
> Marc,
>
> The U.S. has opted to go completely with nukes. I personally feel this
> is short sighted as there is no better submarine for coastal defense
> than a diesel submarine.
>
> David Bartsch



************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************