Dean, 
Excellent results are being had with the Hummingbird unit (model
977 I think).  You have to build your towfish (Carsten had a spare for
sale) and add some cable (up to 300 ft.).  You should be able to do all of
this I think for under $1500. 
R/Jay 
  
Respectfully, 
Jay K. Jeffries 
Andros Is., Bahamas 
  
Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.  
    - Euripides (484 BC - 406 BC) 
 
  
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
[mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Recon1st@aol.com 
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 10:35 AM 
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Stopping Flaps 
 
 
  
Side scan for sure would be Ideal. Budget will hinder me on this
one. Seems like last I new 
 
a unit that would do the job is much more than I will have in the
entire sub. 
 
I have worked with our local search and Rescue with around a
$100,000 unit and it would be 
 
In a message dated 8/29/2008 9:18:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
ag@desertstar.com writes: 
 
Dean, 
 
You may want to consider doing initial acquisition of a target with a side scan
from the surface. 
Cheaper and you can go faster.  Then break out the sub when you want to
explore/document a target in 
detail.  Perhaps not as fun as 100% sub, but will probably be quicker. 
 
Hope you find some great wrecks. 
 
-a 
 
 
 
-----Original message----- 
From: Recon1st@aol.com 
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:11:01 -0700 
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Stopping Flaps 
 
> Hi Ian my goal of 6kts is because of the reason for building.  
> I want to explore Lake Superior. From what I can tell from soundings,
most   
> of the bottom is 
> featureless flat bottom. Thousands of ship wrecks etc and I want to
find  and  
> document at 
> least one. 
>   
> So the real reason is my age. Lake Superior is large and there is so
little   
> time. 
>   
> Visibility is good up to 100' or so, and I would like to cruise above
the   
> bottom 20 30 feet, to view 
> the maximum area. I do have general areas that some of the more famous
ones   
> went 
> missing, but once again a lot of ground to cover and mostly boring. 
>   
> Many good points have been raised about brakes and I think I understand
the   
> concerns. 
> My best safety procedure is not to tread in waters deeper than 350'.
I   
> totally understand 
> that this is a lot of speed and possibly dangerous. 
>   
> Speed will only be used when I feel safe doing so, and for sure a good
look   
> at the search 
> area with surface sonar will be standard operating. 
>   
> Forward searching sonar is a must for avoidance, reverse thrust 
and  very  
> quick maneuverability are 
> my other solutions. Murky water would be a complete NO NO   
>   
> Besides all else I am going to paint it pretty and will not stand for
any   
> scratches 
>   
> Dean 
>   
>   
> In a message dated 8/28/2008 3:03:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time,   
> irox@ix.netcom.com writes: 
>  
>  
> Hi, 
>  
> kind of similar to Andy's "lots of reverse" idea:   If
you plan to travel at 
> 6knots, then your motor must be able to deliver  the required thrust
to get 
> you to that speed.  So, why not just select  a motor which can
deliver 4x 
> (or what ever multipler is appropriate) the  force you need and have
a 
> "full emergency reverse" button which would use  the full
power of the motor 
> to slow the sub down - idealy the emergency  reverse speed would cut
off 
> after a certain period.  You would only  ever use at maximum 1/4
power for 
> non-emergency operations.  We know  reverse works and this would
involve 
> only beefing up components that are  already going to be used (i.e.,
no 
> new inventions, research and risk  required). 
>  
> I've read this thread out of order, so maybe this was  already
discussed. 
>  
> Dean, what's the reason the sub needs to travel so  fast? 
>  
> Cheers, 
> Ian. 
>  
>  
> -----Original  Message----- 
> >From: Andrew Goldstein  <ag@desertstar.com> 
> >Sent: Aug 27, 2008 7:00 AM 
> >To:  personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> >Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Stopping  Flaps 
> > 
> >The following should be filed under "insane" and not 
attempted without A  
> LOT of testing etc, but for the sake of  discussion, 
> > 
> >A primary benefit of the small sub is enhanced  dynamics and low
inertia,  
> which makes systems which are not viable on a large  sub possibly
interesting.   
> Think  deep flight vs an  SSN.... 
> > 
> >If truly for "extreme and eminent" collision, it seems 
that it may be  
> possible to add a few extra external scuba tanks and some   
> >regulators and a control manifold inside the hull.  These
extra  bottles  
> could normally be held in reserve for backup buoyancy or as a 
redundant ballast  
> blow system.  Or in an emergency move a valve on the  manifold
and blow A LOT  
> of air forward of the sub. 
> >An air jet  break.   It has the added benefit that if
you design it wrong  
> you  may instead get aft firing torpedoes  :) 
> > 
> >-a 
> > 
> > 
> >-----Original  message----- 
> >From: Recon1st@aol.com 
> >Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008  13:48:58 -0700 
> >To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> >Subject: Re:  [PSUBS-MAILIST] Stopping Flaps 
> > 
> >> R/Jay I understand this  problem. And my thoughts are only
and extreme   
> >> eminent  collision would this 
> >> be deployed to avoid or lesson the impact of  a collision.
If ever   
> deployed  
> >> surfacing  is  required. 
> >> my prop will be shrouded and foul proofed rudder.   
> >>   
> >> The one scenario I can think of that would not  be a good
idea to deploy   
> >> would be running into  a 
> >> fish net. Sure do not need any thing else getting tied up.
But  for the   
> >> boulder that will jump up 
> >> and smack me,  I do think this is a viable solution. 
> >>   
> >>  Dean 
> >>   
> >>   
> >> In a message dated  8/26/2008 11:30:56 A.M. Central Daylight
Time,   
> >>  bottomgun@mindspring.com writes: 
> >>  
> >>   
> >>  Dean,  
> >> You  have to be concerned with the chute fouling your 
propulsion/steering  
>   
> >> motors.  A big sub could just  shred the drogue while
you could lose   
> propulsion  
> >> just when  you need it most.  Remember that the Navy
decided  that drogues  
> and   
> >> speed brakes were a bad idea after much testing and
stuck   with operating  
> >> within the envelope.  
> >> R/Jay   
> >>   
> >> Respectfully,  
> >> Jay  K.  Jeffries  
> >> Andros  Is., Bahamas  
> >> Talk  sense  to a fool and he calls you
foolish.    
> >> - Euripides (484  BC - 406 BC) 
> >>   
> >>   
> >> From:   owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org   
> >>  [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf
Of    
> Recon1st@aol.com 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:51   AM 
> >> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> >> Subject:  Re:  [PSUBS-MAILIST] Stopping Flaps 
> >>  
> >>    
> >> I did  not know these were tried on military subs. I
just  thought it was  
> a  
> >> good idea  to be able 
> >>    
> >> to  stop quicker. 
> >>   
> >> I do   think for my purposes just the sea anchor blown
out of it's housing  
>   
> >> would be  best for 
> >>   
> >> my   needs. Seems like the manual brake flaps would be
quite complicated  
> and   
> >> slower  than 
> >>   
> >> I  would  like. 
> >>   
> >>  
> >>   
> >>  Dean 
> >>   
> >>  
> >>   
> >>    
> >> In a  message dated 8/25/2008 7:43:51 P.M. Central
Daylight  Time,   
> >> brenthartwig@hotmail.com writes: 
> >>   
> >> Dean,   
> >>  
> >> I found a couple more  items. I'm having trouble finding a
picture of  the  
> >> flaps  open. I had one a while  back. 
> >>  
> >>   
>
http://imageevent.com/albacore/albacorehistoricphotos;jsessionid=r9qabaad11.ti 
> >> 
ger_s?n=25&z=2&w=0&x=0&c=4&m=24&p=24 
> >> "The  parachutes were attached to the after end of
Albacore's  fairwater 
> >>  and successfully streamed while the ship was  cruising
submerged. The  
> >> resulting 
> >>  deceleration  curves indicated that such a system
effectively aided in  
> >>   emergency recovery."  
> >>  Project "Bailout" might not have been  the
most successful of Albacore's 
> >>  tests but it certainly  showed some creativity was at
work." 
> >>   
> >>   http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/albacore.htm 
> >>   
> >>  Regards, 
> >> Brent  Hartwig 
> >>    
> >>  ____________________________________ 
> >>   
> >>  From:  brenthartwig@hotmail.com 
> >> To:  personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> >> Subject:  [PSUBS-MAILIST]  Stopping Flaps 
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:03:24   -0700 
> >>  
> >> Dean, 
> >>  
> >> You could  install some sort of stopping flaps  (speed
brakes) on both  
> sides   
> >> of your sub that are curved to fit the shape of  your
hull.  Much like a  
> US Navy  
> >> test sub USS Albacore. Then operate them  with 
hydraulics or adapted  
> electric  
> >> actuators starting with  a unit like the Lenco  Trim
Tab actuators. 
> >>  
> >> I've  been planning on having this type or braking 
system on my winged   
> >> underwater gliding subs. With two stopping flaps on
the   training edge of  
> the wings.  
> >> One opening up, and one down at the  same  time. 
> >> "Built as a test bed for the U.S. Navy, the  Albacore
featured a  
> >>  tear-drop shaped hull, new diving  controls, a dorsal
rudder and a new  
> >>  high-yield steel for  her pressure hull. In addition,
the Navy, at one  
> time  
> >>  or  another, experimented with speed brakes,
contra-rotating screws, a   
> >>  drag chute, camouflage paint and three different 
arrangements of stern  
> >>  control surfaces. 
> >> The NSF  report ignited debate within Navy circles over a
variety of  
> >>   issues such as the merits of twin propellers vs.
singles, and the  
> sacrifice   
> >>  of surface stability for undersea speed. The result of
the   
> recommendations  
> >>  and ensuing debate was the U.S.S.  Albacore. 
> >>   
> >> The Dorsal rudder was reinstalled and  enlarged and the boat
 
> >>  was outfitted with speed brakes.  These brakes -
another concept borrowed  
> >>  from aviation -  technology, consisted of 10 hinged
panels ringing the  
> >>  after  part of the ship. When needed, they were
hydraulically opened into  
>   
> >>  the waterflow, bringing the boat to a rapid 
stop." 
> >>  
> >>   http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/albacore.htm 
> >>    
> >>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Albacore_(AGSS-569) 
> >>    
> >> Regards, 
> >> Brent  Hartwig 
> >>     
> >> ____________________________________ 
> >>    
> >> From:  Recon1st@aol.com 
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008  18:55:44 -0400 
> >> Subject: Re:  [PSUBS-MAILIST] Air  Tanks 
> >> To:  personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> >>   
> >>  
> >>  
> >> Frank  I am using 12hp for my main  propulsion. I gave
up trying to  
> calculate  
> >> speed  but I  should have 
> >>   
> >> plenty.  The reason for so  much maneuverability is the
bottom of Lake  
> >> Superior many   granite boulders 
> >>   
> >> etc.  I will need to  travel pretty fast to cover any
amount of the Lake.  
> I am  
> >>   thinking of a 20 to 30' above the 
> >>   
> >> bottom   but at 6 knots or so when one of those big
beast jumps up in  
> front of   
> >> me, I  am going to need 
> >>   
> >>  options.  A transfer pump or sliding weight for sure
would not fit my   
> needs.  
> >> I may  even have an  
> >>   
> >>  emergency  sea anchor deployment for quick stops.
Reverting back to my   
> drag  
> >> racing  days. 
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   
> >> I  loved the dry dive video. I learned  much watching
it maneuver I have  
> >> greater  confidence that  my 
> >>   
> >> efforts  should yield the kind of  performance I am
looking for. Not to  
> >> mention it  oughta be a  real 
> >>   
> >> hoot  to drive  hehehhe 
> >>   
> >>  
> >>   
> >>  Dean 
> >>   
> >>  
> >>   
> >>    
> >> In  a message dated 8/24/2008 8:15:39 P.M. Central
Daylight  Time,   
> >> ShellyDalg@aol.com writes: 
> >>   
> >>   
> >> Hi  Dean. I think you're chasing the  right idea with
front and back dive   
> >> planes. I had  considered that but let it go because of the
extra work. It  
>  just   
> >> seems to me that back dive planes would be a real plus if
you  have   
> enough  
> >> power to make them work. Did you see the "dry 
dive" videos? With  the  
> center  
> >> mounted dive planes the sub  stays level when
ascending/diving  but it  
> would be nice  
> >> to  be able to angle the sub just with the dive 
planes. Like you say,  
> much   
> >> like flying. I don't know how much speed you'd  have to
get  to make the  
> dive  
> >> planes overcome the front/back balance,  but  if it's
close enough to  
> neutral, it  
> >> may not take that  much power.   
> >>   
> >> Twin  trim tanks front  and back with a transfer pump
would help if the  
> pump  
> >> was   able to shift weight fast enough. Maybe a sliding
drop weight would  
> be    
> >> less trouble to make.  I will be able to shift the
seat  forward and   
> backward a  
> >> little and I'm hoping that will give  me a little angle
change.  Damn, I  
> wanna  
> >> get this thing wet  soon! Frank  D.  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>   
> >>    
> >>  ____________________________________ 
> >>   
> >> It's   only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find
your travel deal  
> _here_   
> >> 
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)  . 
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>   
> >>    
> >>  ____________________________________ 
> >>   
> >> It's   only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find
your travel deal  
> _here_   
> >> 
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)  . 
> >> = 
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>   
> >>    
> >>  ____________________________________ 
> >>   
> >> It's   only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find
your travel deal  
> _here_   
> >> 
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)  . 
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>   
> >> **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go.
Find  your  
> travel  
> >> deal here.       
> >>  (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) 
> >>   
> >>   
> > 
> > 
> > 
>
>************************************************************************ 
>
>************************************************************************ 
> >************************************************************************ 
> >The  personal submersibles mailing list complies with the
US  Federal 
> >CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our 
database 
> >because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive 
messages 
> >from our organization. 
> > 
> >If you want to be  removed from this mailing list simply click on
the 
> >link below or send a  blank email message to: 
> >     removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
> > 
> >Removal of your email  address from this mailing list occurs by
an 
> >automated process and  should be complete within five minutes of 
> >our server receiving your  request. 
> > 
> >PSUBS.ORG 
> >PO Box 53 
> >Weare, NH   03281 
> >603-529-1100 
> >************************************************************************ 
>
>************************************************************************ 
>
>************************************************************************ 
> > 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ************************************************************************ 
> ************************************************************************ 
> ************************************************************************ 
> The  personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal 
> CAN-SPAM  Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our
database 
> because  either you, or someone you know, requested you receive
messages 
> from our  organization. 
>  
> If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply  click on the 
> link below or send a blank email message to: 
> removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
>  
> Removal of your email address  from this mailing list occurs by an 
> automated process and should be  complete within five minutes of 
> our server receiving your  request. 
>  
> PSUBS.ORG 
> PO Box 53 
> Weare, NH   03281 
> 603-529-1100 
> ************************************************************************ 
> ************************************************************************ 
> ************************************************************************ 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your
travel  
> deal here.       
> (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) 
>  
>  
 
 
 
************************************************************************ 
************************************************************************ 
************************************************************************ 
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal 
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database 
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages 
from our organization. 
 
If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the 
link below or send a blank email message to: 
    removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org 
 
Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an 
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of 
our server receiving your request. 
 
PSUBS.ORG 
PO Box 53 
Weare, NH  03281 
603-529-1100 
************************************************************************ 
************************************************************************ 
************************************************************************ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
It's only a deal if it's where you
want to go. Find your travel deal here. 
 
 
 |