Hi Vance,
Thanks for the flange mounted ball valve. I hadn't
thought of that. I think it will do fine and i'll be looking into
it!
Best Regards,
Jim K
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 7:40
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] MBT air
lock
Jim, You might think about a flange mounted ball valve, and cut
the top end (flange, pipe or female pipe) all the way down to the upper
extremity of the ball housing adjustment ring. That would get it down to a
reasonable height, I think. Vance
-----Original
Message----- From: Jim Kocourek <kocpnt@tds.net> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Sent:
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 7:16 am Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] MBT air lock
Hi Vance,
Thanks for the good info. As`anyone who knows me
well will attest, I do not have a lot of patience. I am finalizing my design
for the soft tanks now and will have a larger size valve actuated with a thru
hull on each tank with no line. It will vent directly out. I am looking for
possibly a slide valve or something that will have a large opening and not
take up too much space. If I don't find anything better I will use 1-1/2 inch
ball valves.
Best Regards,
Jim K
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:52
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] MBT air
lock
Hey guys,
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but it was,
in fact, perfectly normal in the oilfield subs to trim a little heavy and
"ride the bubble" meaning a shot of air in the MBTs to maneuver with. It's
handy if you are operating near the bottom, and very quick, assuming a
fairly stable depth. That way, you can goof around down there to your
heart's content, and vent quick to settle onto the bottom if and/or when you
need to. Neutral buoyancy via small trim systems is a fine thing, but slow
and finicky to do (except in the JSLs which have almost as much VBT as most
boats have MBT).
Don't sell yourself short by saying that there's
only one way to do things, as there are, in fact, a whole pile of variations
out there, and they're like spare ammunition for your personal defense
firearm--mighty handy to have when you need them. The Navy guys cringe at
the idea of that bubble, but it worked a treat, and was even included in the
beginning pilot's training classes, right alongside VBT-101 and all the
rest.
As to the fairwater vent valve size, bigger is better. George's
were (are) too small. When I vent, I want to GO!, and I mean right now.
Three-quarter inch valves are, in my opinion, about the minimum. One inch
and up would be even better!!! That's for ball valves, of
course.
The Aquarius used pneumatic mushroom valves designed pretty
much after a dry suit vent valve, only bigger. The vent area itself was
an inch and a half in diameter (or thereabouts) with a ring of half inch
holes in the body. Pop the valve and out came the air, and I don't mean
maybe. You could vent a half ton of fairwater ballast air in no time flat,
and it was really nice to be able to get underwater without all that waiting
around.
Remember, anything you can do to keep from spilling your
coffee is worth a try. Wallowing around in three or four meter waves is
something you don't want to do any more of than you have to. Taking that
lesson forward, it stands to reason that the more flexible you can make your
sub, the more capable it will be, and that translates to a better tool for
you. It's a sort of belt and suspenders approach, which I heartily approve
of.
Vance
-----Original Message----- From: Dan. H.
<jumachine@comcast.net> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Sent:
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:57 pm Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] MBT air
lock
Frank and Brian,
The MBT's are only used at the surface. When diving they should
be totally full of water and not used for depth control. When the
tanks are being flooded, all air gets expelled, even the air in the
line. That's how the water gets in the line. Once my tanks are
full of water I leave the vent valves open and never feel a difference in
buoyancy while diving..
The Variable Ballast Tank (VBT or hard ballast tank) is
what is use to adjust buoyancy. That's designed with all ports
closable so once it's set, the bubble can't shrink or expand while your
diving.
Frank,
It looks to me like your system will work since your lines is
sloped back. Any water caught in them should eventually
settle back in the tank, but you can't have any dips.. A three eights
line may be a little small though. It will take a long time to
vent and it's harder for air to travel up as the water runs back. Half
inch would be better. Water will be caught in the pipe above the
closed vent valve though. If it's low to the water line, it may be
blown out by the pressure in the MBT but if it's not, a quick burst of fill
air through your T will surely clear the line.
Still, I feel the better way to deal with the vents is to place the
valve right at the top of the tank and run linkage rather then tubing.
But it's not the only way. As long as you can prevent water from
getting trapped in the line or have a method to blow it out it will work.
Dan H.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:04
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] MBT air
lock
Hi guys. Is the air lock problem on the ballast tanks due
to the line from tank to valve being too long? Or is it that the
valve has a length of line above it that holds water ?
I know that the line can't have any low spots in it, or even just run
level, but must have a continuous up-slope. I remember Gary saying his
original installation had a low/level spot that trapped a little water and
effectively plugged the line, but he fixed it by moving the valve higher.
His valves are located outside the tower, with the
valve handles inside and a seal on the valve handle shaft. It's
a nice clean installation.
I am planning on running the lines into the sub, and using a
''T'' with air line to blow the tanks, and the line exiting the sub near
the top of the hull. This method has the same number of thru-hulls,
but has more valves. One on each thru-hull, and one on the ''T'' for the
air line. ( three valves for each tank.)
I think Gary's has a separate air line going to the tank for
blowing dry so basically one thru-hull for the air line and one for the
valve handle shaft.
My ballast tanks are several inches higher at the connection, and I'm
hoping that with the short length of the plumbing, I should be able to
avoid any blockage.
The hole in the bottom of the tanks is low and 3 inch diameter. I was
planning on using a 1/2 inch thru-hull for releasing the air. Does anyone
think that's too small ?
I'll try to put a sketch of the system up so you guys can comment on
it.
Frank D.
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date:
3/18/2008 8:10 AM
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.8/1337 - Release Date: 3/20/2008
8:10 PM
|