Hi all,
I still can use a bit of help. I have downloaded
the parker info, but get an error message and am unable to use it. I am planning
on using a 3/8 inch O-Ring in the hatch to provide a bit more working range
vertically. I plan on height of .225 inch and a width at the top and narrowest
portion of groove of .225 inch. This will give me .150 inch squish height and
will put the retaining part of the cove wall at just over 50 % of the
uncompressed O-Ring height. I plan on having the coved wall on the O.D.
portion of the groove. Both flanges or my hatch are 516 Gr 70 and will be
painted.
Does this approach sound reasonable to those of you
who have been there?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Jim Kocourek
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:23
AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Coved O-ring
Groove
Jim,
Go to http://apps.parker.com/ead/cm2.asp?cmid=2973 and
download the Parker inPHorm O-ring software for free. This is the
software that I used to design the gland I used for my boat
hatch. The program will give you the exact dimensions of the o-ring
seat including the taper angle. It will also give the hardness of
the o-ring required given the pressures you are trying to seal
against.
Cliff
-----
Original Message ---- From: Jim Kocourek <kocpnt@tds.net> To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 6:10:23
AM Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Coved O-ring Groove
Hi Brent,
I am just preparing to have my hatch oring groove
machined. I am planning on the rectangular cross section as shown in your
drawing with a slight coved outer side.
I am told that there is this type of layout on K-Boats.
In either case, does anyone have or have access to exact dimensions for this
type of groove. I am planning on using a 3/8 inch cross section
O-ring.
Best Regards,
Jim Kocourek
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:36
PM
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Coved
O-ring Groove
I worked up three more drawings to show what I
was thinking a O-ring in a coved gland or square gland with silicone or
urethane filling the square corners of the gland, would look like being
under great pressure. Since I think there would be far more pressure coming
down on the O-ring from the hydrostatic pressure on the hatch's outer
surface then would be coming in from the space between the hatch flange and
seat. Also I would expect that the more exterior hydrostatic pressure
is applied to the hatch that it would further help seal the O-ring against
the seating surface, keeping it from extruding to the low pressure side of
the seal. Any
thoughts? http://www.frappr.com/?a=viewphoto&id=4001713&pid=9275457
Regards, Brent
Hartwig
From:
brenthartwig@hotmail.com To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Bottomed Out
Hatch Flange O-ring Failure Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:37:06
-0800
I've been thinking about this for some
time now, and thought it was time to talk about it. There has been a fair
bit of discussion on O-ring failure in a hatch, by means of extrusion. I
don't think this would be the mode of failure for a hatch O-ring, and here
is why. When the hatch is shut and under water, the exposed surface area
on the O-ring between the two metal mating surfaces is vastly smaller then
the surface area on the top of the whole hatch pushing down on it. This
means that if the pressure is to great for the O-ring, the hatch mating
surfaces will bottom out and then the water will just start to flow past
the O-ring without extruding it. Also if the hatch bottoms out there will
be no place for the O-ring to extrude into. At this point I think the
O-ring would just rather let the water pass between it and the flat flange
mating surface, rather then extrude. Any thoughts?
I made up
a model to better show what I'm thinking the O-ring would look like when
fully compressed into it's gland by a bottomed out hatch flange.
http://www.frappr.com/?a=viewphoto&id=4001713&pid=9115314
Here
is a really great link I found today showing a lot more modes of O-ring
failure then I'd seen any place else.
http://www.allorings.com/failure.htm
Not to long ago Frank D. asked about whether he
should cut a coved or square O-ring groove in his hatch, and I don't
remember if any one answered him? I would think the cove would make
for less room for a O-ring to deform into to help keep the metal hatch
surfaces from bottoming out. While watching the Nova show on the Alicia
sub called "Underwater Dream Machine", I noticed that they put a lot of
silicone type sealant in the O-ring groove that is in the large unboltable
flange, that keeps the two large steel pressure hull sections
together. I'm guessing they did this to fill the extra space of a
square type O-ring groove, that the O-ring doesn't fill when in a non
compressed state. So there will be more space between the flanges at
depth, to keep them from bottoming out. Any thoughts, or should I add more
O2 to my snow cave?
Here are two pictures showing snow through the
windows of my house. One shows snow up against a window in the the spa
room, and the other shows that the snow outside my shop window is
completely blocking the view out the window. So when I say snow cave, I
mean it. This is not normal for around here.
http://www.frappr.com/?a=viewphoto&id=4001713&pid=9115443
Regards,
Brent
Hartwig
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1291 - Release
Date: 2/21/2008 11:05 AM
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1291 - Release Date:
2/21/2008 11:05 AM
|