[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PSUBS-MAILIST] Re: Variable Ballast Calculations, Bill



Bill,

"Now imagine.....you ENCLOSED those tanks so their bottoms were enclosed and then you put a water inlet on/off valve at the top of both tanks on the INSIDE of the sub. Now you'dhave a Kittridge sub that had ambient tanks that as they filled they compressed the interior atmosphere of your sub" 

This is an interesting idea worth investigating. I wonder though, about a disparity in volumes between the tanks and interior as well as rate of air flow and how everything ties together.

Thanks

Joe


From: "Akins" <lakins1@tampabay.rr.com>
Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Variable Ballast Calculations
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:51:15 -0500

Hi Joe.
 
There would be no reason you couldn't trust your skills to cycle like that Joe.
 
Think about this. Imagine a Kittridge sub. It has two soft, open to the bottom, external ballast tanks
 
fore and aft correct? Now imagine.....you ENCLOSED those tanks so their bottoms were enclosed
 
and then you put a water inlet on/off valve at the top of both tanks on the INSIDE of the sub. Now you'd
 
have a Kittridge sub that had ambient tanks that as they filled they compressed the interior atmosphere of your sub 
 
and once under and neutrally buoyant, you could close off the valves and actually dive a bit deeper by forcing it
 
under with the dive planes. If you stopped your forward motion you would rise until you reached the point where
 
you were neutrally buoyant again. You might need to build your hull and ballast tanks a bit stronger than a typical
 
ambient though, because once you closed off the tank valves and forced her further under using the dive planes and
 
your forward motion, once you reached a depth that exceeded the internal pressure, you would need ballast tanks and
 
a hull that would hold the pressure. But I don't see it as a markedly radical deviation from building a typical ambient.
 
At any rate, it would be fascinating to see a homebuilt hybrid ambient/1atm like this.
 
Bill.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Perkel
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Variable Ballast Calculations



Bill,

The "hybrid" component of the Hunley is fascinating and would be interesting to consider. But as I told you earlier, I do not trust my engineering skills enough to design the hull in such a manner as to be able to "cycle" like that. But perhaps others would be able to incorporate precisely those ideas, the savings in space and air requirements would be well worth the effort.

Fascinating links...thanks!

Joe


************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages from our organization. If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the link below or send a blank email message to: removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an automated process and should be complete within five minutes of our server receiving your request. PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH 03281 603-529-1100 ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************