Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:Deepflight

["Brian Cox" <ojaivalleybeefarm@dslextreme.com>]

He probably need parts from it for another sub.

----- Original Message -----

From: Paul Kreemer

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 16:42

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:Deepflight

No, it's not Deepflight that's marked as decommisioned, it's the two person trainer Deepflight 502.  Just going off what their website states:

http://deepflight.com/subs/index.htm

The submersibles and the technology associated with Graham Hawkes span many years and have come in many shapes and sizes.

Deep Flight 502 De-Commissioned	Deep Flight I	Deep Flight II Proposed Design
Wet Flight	Deep Rover	Mantis

On 11/7/05, atozed@juno.com <atozed@juno.com> wrote:

Brian-

My through-hulls all have valves.  Cheap easy insurance. Even electrical. A gate valve can cut wire... just in case.

I saw Deepflight a couple weeks ago and heard nothing about "decommissioning". I suspect someone's confusing it with the embolism machine, Wet Flight.

Peter "1 atm" K

 

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:14:34 -0800 "Brian Cox" <ojaivalleybeefarm@dslextreme.com > writes:

Paul,

           What is this about deepflight being "decommisioned" ?    Do you mean that they are just not running the sub anymore or what?

 

My sub is loosely based on deepflight's design.

 

Brian