myles
you need flow not pressure here. any thing over 3
pounds at the discharge would work
rick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:24
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:
Preliminary calculations, please check me
Rick,
I was wondering this very
thing. Is it safe to say that, if surfaced, you would need something
capable of generating a little more than 15 psi to purge the soft ballast
tanks completely ? A shop vac motor is probably capable of
that.
Myles.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:07
PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:
Preliminary calculations, please check me
joe
the surface blow of the soft tanks could
be done with an engine driven low pressure blower. elminating a lot
of the compressed air requirements.
rick m
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 11:44
AM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:
Preliminary calculations, please check me
Yes sir, as I told Rick in my little dissertation there, the idea may
prove impractical at that size for that very reason. I am sure I can build
a hull and systems but I can't make the gas laws do what I want.
I am still playing with ballast and control issues
Joe
From: Myles Hall <myles.h@sasktel.net> Reply-To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] Re: Preliminary calculations, please check
me Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:45:44 -0600
Joe,
It appears to me that if you
are considering an ambient design that also has large ballast capacity,
you are going to have to carry a ton of on board compressed air.
That seems to be the issue with ambient designs.
Myles.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005
11:50 AM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:
Preliminary calculations, please check me
Myles,
I am sitting here trying to make sense of some numbers
but you may be interested in this as you are interested in the same
basic dimensions I am.
According to the NAVPERS manual a Gato class fleet boat had a
surface displacement of 1,750 tons and submerged 2,228 tons at neutral
trim. The MBT were 16% of trim at 359 tons, not counting fuel
tanks which were always full of either D.O. or seawater. There is a
difference of some 28% between surface displacement and neutral.
I do not yet know how this scales down but I am trying to
figure out some basics here, like tank size and air requirements. I
see widely varying numbers in different submersibles.
If I have to double the cabin air to maintain a dry ambient boat @
33', I may have to rethink an open bottom design.
I am finding lots of stability considerations as well.
Joe
From: Myles Hall <myles.h@sasktel.net> Reply-To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org To:
personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] Re: Preliminary calculations, please check
me Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:11:19 -0600
Joe,
I'm sure it's all
dependant on what you want the sub to do. For me, I want
something with decent surface running so that I can drive the thing
to the dive location. With this in mind, I am looking for
quite a bit of ballast bouyancy to get as much of the boat out of
the water as I can to reduce the drag. I am looking to have my
dive planes up high on the hull so that they clear the water as well
when in surface trim.
However, I figure if you
just want enough ballast to get you sufficient free board, you could
get away with considerably less than 40%.
Myles.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 30,
2005 6:38 AM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Re:
Preliminary calculations, please check me
Thanks Paul and Myles,
30 to 45% is quite a bit, I am still working the numbers to see
if this is doable.
Joe
From: Paul Kreemer <paulkreemer@gmail.com> Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] Preliminary calculations, please check
me Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:50:07
-0700
Yes, using 63 lb/cf of seawater gives about 16cf
needed to weigh 1000lb.
I think a WWII style boat which was more on the
surface than submerged
would have 30% or more reserve buoyancy. Like
Myles says.
Joe,
My design calls for
about 45%. I want to get that thing out of the water
when surface running. Also, I
figure a guy needs all the bouyancy he can get when
launching the thing so that
you don't need 6' of water. I'm going for the
"better to have too much
than not enough" concept. Hopefully I'm not
overlooking
something.
Myles.
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US
Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our
database because either you, or someone you know, requested you
receive messages from our organization. If you want to be removed
from this mailing list simply click on the link below or send a
blank email message to: removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request. PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH
03281 603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive
messages from our organization. If you want to be removed from this
mailing list simply click on the link below or send a blank email
message to: removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org Removal of your
email address from this mailing list occurs by an automated process
and should be complete within five minutes of our server receiving
your request. PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH 03281 603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database because
either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages from our
organization. If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply
click on the link below or send a blank email message to:
removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org Removal of your email address
from this mailing list occurs by an automated process and should be
complete within five minutes of our server receiving your request.
PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH 03281 603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
|