[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Decisions decisions decisions....



Actually Brian, expect something like that in about ten years.
Carl


Brian Cox wrote:
> 
> As long as this thread is engaging in" wouldn't it be neat to..."  what I think might be interesting would be to hold a future psubs convention at an underwater habitat where everybody "arrives" via their sub.  Of course we would have to have a temporary underwater habitat where subs could rise up underneath an open "hanger" to enter the facility.  Then show slides etc..
> 
> Brian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Coalbunny" <coalbunny@vcn.com>
> To: "P-Subs" <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:49 PM
> Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Decisions decisions decisions....
> 
> > I have done a lot of thinking about this, and it has literally taken
> > several years to make a concrete decision.  I have several ideas for a
> > sub, but couldn't figure out which one I was going to build first.  They
> > were an ambient sub for treasure hunting, a submersable habitat, a
> > replica sub and a real go-getter: an animal replica.  The last one would
> > be fun, that's for sure.  Couldn't decide if I wanted it to be a rainbow
> > trout, great white shark or the Loch Ness monster.  Ask yourself what
> > you'd be thinking if you saw one of those in a lake.  I think you get
> > the idea why I like that idea so much!
> >
> > I still don't know *for sure* which one will be built first.  But I have
> > put the submersable habitat on the back burner along with the treasure
> > seeker.  The cost is the biggest reason.  So now I'm deciding between
> > *which* replica to go for.
> >
> > So from the legal standpoint, what are your thoughts on the replicas?
> > My concern is someone going psycho after seeing a great white shark in
> > Lake Powell and me being liable for it.  Is that possible?  I think it's
> > very realistic in this day and age.  And the liability issue is one of
> > the deciding factors.
> >
> > The other replicas would be of a larger sub.  One in particular I have
> > been considering is the USS Nautilus, SSN 571.  One thing to remember is
> > that on a replica, I would prefer staying as close to exact scale as
> > possible.  I realize that in some areas this can't be done.  Like the
> > c-tower, for example.  For something toliterally be an exact replica, I
> > know the size would be enormous.
> >
> > Anyhow, food for thought.  Any ideas from you guys?
> > Carl
> >
> > --
> >  "With the first link, the chain is forged.  The first speech censured,
> > the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied....chains us all
> > irrevocably.  The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we are all
> > damaged."  -- Capt. Picard, STNG
> >

-- 
 "With the first link, the chain is forged.  The first speech censured,
the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied....chains us all
irrevocably.  The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we are all
damaged."  -- Capt. Picard, STNG