[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Passive vs active sonar
I believe that you would need recievers and transmitters on all sides to do
that. All data could be input into software like what Warren is describing
to feed out a "Global" view.
Jay.
Coalbunny
<coalbunny@vcn.com> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Sent by: cc:
owner-personal_submersible Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Passive vs active sonar
s@psubs.org
28/03/2003 04:32 PM
Please respond to
personal_submersibles
Why isn't it possible to get a "fish finder" that could give a "global"
view around the sub? I have heard of similar stuff for the USN. The
global view isn't "the entire Earth", but instead it creates a "globe"
around the sub using the sonar. It is roughly 360* around the sub.
With todays technology there's no reason why it can't be done, that I
can see.
Carl
Warren Greenway wrote:
>
> I think an engineer I know designed fish finders for
> a few years. I'll ask him what he knows. Maybe it
> wouldn't be that hard use the transponders with our
> own systems.
>
> Warren.
>
> --- jbarlow@bjservices.ca wrote:
> >
> > If their OK, I was thinking of five or six pointed
> > in all directions, even
> > up possibly.
> >
> > You can also buy very good side scan sonar, but its
> > pricey. I thought that
> > perhaps the fish finder would be a poor man's way to
> > roughly estimate
> > bottom and collisions etc. It should be good at
> > close range right? And
> > that's where you would be most concerned about
> > collisions etc? I would
> > think that if it could see fish out to 120' then
> > maybe something as large
> > as a motorboat or the bottom at much greater
> > ranges??
> >
> >
> >
> > Jay.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ward Monroe
> >
> >
> > <wardomon@comcast.net>
> > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
> >
> > Sent by:
> > cc:
> >
> > owner-personal_submersible
> > Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Passive vs active
> > sonar
> > s@psubs.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 27/03/2003 09:03 PM
> >
> >
> > Please respond to
> >
> >
> > personal_submersibles
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It depends on where you aim it. BottomLine
> > fishfinders have a
> > sidefinder that will see fish out to something like
> > 120 feet, maybe more
> > I don't exactly remember, as well as down. Wiring
> > up several heads into
> > an array shouldn't be much of a challenge for the
> > electronically
> > informed. Color displays are also available. How
> > cool would that be?
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 19:36, Michael Fodor wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah it is but you have to keep in mind that all
> > your scanning with a
> > fish finder is the bottom, and not all around you.
> > >
> > > jbarlow@bjservices.ca wrote:
> > > A fish finder is active sonar. I don't know how
> > high quality you can get
> > > or how good they are these days.
> > >
> > > I think it might bear investigating though.
> > >
> > > Comments??
> > >
> > > Jay.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael Fodor
> > > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
> > > Sent by: cc:
> > > owner-personal_submersible Subject: RE:
> > [PSUBS-MAILIST] Passive vs active
> > sonar
> > > s@psubs.org
> > >
> > >
> > > 27/03/2003 03:31 PM
> > > Please respond to
> > > personal_submersibles
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Are there Passive and Active sonar for sale that
> > could fit into our subs
> > ?
> > > Any links or sites worth mentioning ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rob wrote:
> > > Wow, I can finally add value. Passive sonar
> > (simply put) is listing to
> > > the sounds around you without doing any noise
> > making of your own.
> > > Active sonar is generating a sound then listening
> > to the echo from
> > > objects near you. Active sonar is what you get in
> > the movies. That
> > > "ping" noise. The active sonar I was used to
> > (x-navy here) does not
> > > usually sound like the classic "ping".
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
> > > [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On
> > Behalf Of peter
> > > mckellar
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:51 AM
> > > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
> > > Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Passive vs active sonar
> > >
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > could someone please explain the difference
> > between active and passive
> > > sonar?
> > >
> > > thx in advance
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HGC. Michael
> > >
> > > The new Guardian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > D! o you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> > live on your desktop!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HGC. Michael
> > >
> > > The new Guardian
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> > live on your desktop!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
> http://platinum.yahoo.com
--
"You delight not in a city's seven or seventy wonders, but in an answer
it gives to a question of yours, or the question it asks you, forcing
you to answer, like Thebes through the mouth of the Sphinx." -- Kublai
Khan