Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Open source submarine

[Garry Muir <garry.muir4@virgin.net>]

Hi Folks

Carsten's got a good point it should be a non commercial venture but we are after all only looking at a concept at the moment and I am sure most  of us are just looking for a safer and easier and hopefully cheaper way of getting our selves below the surface. 

Regards, Garry 

On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 03:55  pm, Carsten Standfuss wrote:

> An open source sub - means an non commerzial vessel. 
>
> It schould be designed close to the classification rules
> - so the vessel is save. And his widow has the chanche to get 
> the money from the insurance company..
>
> In the moment you have in the eye to make this to a commerzial project -
> its is not longer a Psub - and I am out .. or somebody has to pay my
> bill for the hours I spend (maybe) to the project.. 
>
> So the drawing should be labeled : "Not for commerzial porpose".. 
>
> regards Carsten 
>
>
> Fly Deep schrieb:
> > I haven't had time to read all of the e-mails that are concerning this
> > "Open Source Submarine Project" But what I've seen so far is GREAT.
> > It's why I joined this site and I was a little disappointed in the
> > beginning but I dident want to say any thing. I dident feel it was my
> > place to say any thing.  I've learned that some times the best thing
> > to say is nothing at all, and that most good things fix them selves.
> > I belive that the concept of designing a new and very bulidabel
> > personal submarine is very good and that it should be designed around
> > the requirements of ABS and should have the capacity to be used for
> > making money after it's built.  In other words, if cretin criteria are
> > met through the construction stages then it should become an inspected
> > vessel and could be used as such.  If we're going to do this then lets
> > do it right.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now