[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Ballast Question
Hello there, and happy new year you
all.
Again my advise would be for new comers in
psusbs making, to get you scuba certification.
Most of your questions would be answeared and your
misconceptions corrected.
You would also have fun and scuba is the logical
start and a must for any subman.
The rock weights the same whether you are at 1000
ft or 10 ft.
everybody is positive buoyant at the surface,
unless your body is all screwed up and metal plate boned armored.
Although you have to kick to go down at first,
after about 50 ft you become negative as your body, not only the lungs are being
compressed, and you sink.
This is why bodies of seamen who went deep down
with their ship never resurface.
Herve
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 5:37
AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Ballast
Question
Hello Pierre:
I am far from expert... but if I screw up,
I'm sure somebody will correct me.
I believe you to be laboring
under some misconceptions. As you descend, the air in a ballast tank
that is open to the outside does indeed compress... though I am not sure it
compresses by half at twice the distance. That does seem logical,
however.
The thing is that with the air compressed to half size at
depth, the water it displaces is also "heavier", though it is not
compressible. The wight of the water is what causes the air to
compress. It has all the weight of the water above it to add to its
weight. Thus, though the compressed air is denser (heavier) and
theoretically not as buoyant, in water that is also heavier by the same
factor, it retains its buoyancy... in fact it becomes even more buoyant, I
believe.
The reason you adjust ballast as you go down is because you
can't descend unless you do. In the example you are using, trying to
double your depth by using electric propulsion. This might work if you
had unlimited power because you would have to maintain downward thrust in
order to keep it down there. It is kind of like a helicopter in
reverse. A helicopter opposes gravity by downward thrust, you would be
opposing buoyancy (or really just gravity again) by upward thrust. As
soon as you shut off your power, you would rise to the level you had adjusted
your buoyancy to.
Now, if your ballast tanks are pressurized so that
the air in them cannot be compressed, you could have more buoyancy from the
same volume of air at sea level and this might allow you to have smaller
ballast tanks... but you'd pay for it in the weight of the tanks
themselves.
Try this trick some day. Dive to the bottom of a pool
and pick up a rock... the biggest one you can iift and try to bring it to the
surface. You will find that while you can lift it on the bottom, as you
rise, you will need to use more and more effort to keep rising. This is
the same principle in reverse.
Now, for a better example. Go into
the pool again and dive down. You will find that unless you are one of
those unfortunate people who have negative buoyancy, you must maintain
muscular effort to remain below the surface. The air in your lungs, your
"ballast tanks", though compressed, is still buoyant... and the deeper you
dive, the more effort you must expend to stay down. If you expell some
air, you will find that you can stay down with not nearly as much effort...
but don't go too deep, you also reduce the air reserve in your lungs that you
need to breath.
Keep on asking questions. It is easier to answer
your questions than the questions your wife, children, and other relatives
will ask after your death.
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 09:30, Pierre Poulin
wrote:
Hi there every body! It's the newbi again.
I'm working on an a dry ambient sub. The hull is 60% finish.
I tought that the ballast system was pretty simple but then I figured that
if I have a main ballast system witch is opened at the bottom and I ajust
the buyancy at 33 feet. Then, I go at 66 feet using electric motors. The
buyancy will need to be ajusted again since the air in the ballast will be 2
times smaller. Right? So the deeper I go, the faster I sink?
Would it be better if the ballast was able to support the pressure like an 1
atm design and you close the bottom of the ballast witch is normaly open? So
the volume of air will remain the same? I do realize that when I will try to
put more air in the ballast, I will have to play with 2 valves at the same
time to conpensate.
Is that a variable ballast system? Is there a difference between those two
systems (main and variable)?
I'm a bit confused with that! I'm looking for something as simple as
possible.
I tought that some of you guys who are more experienced surely have the
answer to my problem!
Thanks for your help!
Pierre Poulin
>From cold Québec, Canada.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis !
http://www.msn.fr/msger/default.asp