Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] little sub brother again

["Bob Teufel" <robert.teufel@verizon.net>]

Thanks Dewey,

Your critique was great!  I had begun to consider the bottom issues and
entanglement, and I'm sure that will prompt some design adjustments.

Previous reviews of the concept have allowed me to reconsider ballast
ballancing and my "Saddlebags" which are purely asthetic at this point, so I
really appreciate the critical thoughts of another, especially one with more
experience!

Thanks Again,

Bob Teufel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dewey Mason" <drmason2001@yahoo.com>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] little sub brother again


> Bob,
>    Keep in mind that you must be very careful of the
> bottom you set down on, and have a thought to escaping
> if it is soft enough to form suction on your sub. Mud
> is a real bear to pull out of under water. Also
> protrusions may be a way to become tangled in things
> unseen, and that is not a good thing. Whole thing
> looks cute though. If you want it to look more than to
> do, go with an ambi-sub. They are much less critical
> on the shape requirements for strength.
>
> =====
> Dewey R. Mason II
> The Deep Past Foundation
> deeppastfoundation@yahoo.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>