[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[PSUBS-MAILIST] More TECH TALK
Just got off the phone with Dave at DC Marine in 
Arizona; my MK RT-101/S should be here by Monday; installation to 
follow.
 
Dave is a very experienced and knowledgeable tech, 
who has supplied many stock motors and built many custom propulsion systems for 
owners of small submarines and ROV's around the World; and his website 
at:
 
 
Dave's pretty busy most of the time; but he said 
he'll try to answer technical questions on an "as able" basis.  Today we 
got into a good rap over the phone, and he clarified for me some things that 
have been talked about at PSUBS lately.
 
1. MK rates their motors as watertight to one 
additional atmosphere beyond surface pressure: a depth of 33 
feet.  People have been known to operate them to about 100 feet 
without modifications to the lower end unit, and the failure rate at that 
depth is about 4 to 5 percent.  Still, the company won't stand behind that, 
so 33 feet is the specified depth limit for seal integrity, according to 
MK.   And no, doubling the number of seals won't ensure operations at 
greater depths, because pressure sufficient to implode the outer seal will also 
be enough to implode the inner seal, too.  (Since they are side by side on 
the shaft, there is no cumulative increase in their depth resistant 
integrity.  When the water gets past one, it will immediately bring it's 
pressure to bear against the other, which will at that time be operating alone, 
and have no greater strength than it's failed counterpart.)
 
2. Yes, MK motors run fine and have excellent 
depth compensation qualities when the lower end is filled with transformer 
oil.  The fluid is of a fine enough viscosity that reductions in 
armature RPM are not a problem.  Dave has used this method on many motors 
he's built for customers, some of whom are operating ROV's at 300 FSW; for these 
units, Dave also polishes the armature shaft to a 4 micron finish, and 
substitutes a matched bushing and seal in place of the stock ones.  But for 
shallow ops, no compensation is necessary; and at moderate depths, the oil alone 
is sufficient.  Just make sure the case is completely topped off and free 
of any air voids (impart a vacuum to the case before filling).  There's 
another fluid that can be used: it's called by the nickname "Jesus water"; Dave 
couldn't recall the exact name of it; and he 
hasn't been able to find any for a long time; but if anyone knows what this 
stuff is and where to get it, it sounds like it might be another option worth 
considering.
 
3. As some of us already know, air compensation 
works fine; Dave agrees, but thinks the oil filled method is a better in terms 
of simplicity, reliability, lubrication, and such.  This time around, I'm 
sticking with air compensation; but I might try oil in the future, when I'm not 
facing a deadline to get the boat into the water like I am now.
 
4. Lately, there's been some discussion at PSUBS 
about continuity between the three sections of the lower end housing being 
possibly disrupted by paint or O-rings at the juncture points.  According 
to Dave, this shouldn't be a problem, because the three sections are joined by 
the armature shaft which passes through bronze bushings in each component.  
Maybe there's more to this "gremlin" than meets the eye.  I don't 
know.
 
5. Of course, if a motor does get flooded, it's got 
to be disassembled and serviced.  The methods Ron, Herve, and others 
mentioned sound good: open it up; rinse it with kerosene or the like; dry it 
thoroughly, and reassemble.  Carsten's idea of a little oil inside as a 
preventative measure to inhibit rust is good, too.
 
6. If you do have to disassemble your lower end 
unit, the critical part of reassembly is BRUSH TIMING with the armature.  
This was a little complicated, so I'm waiting for a better detailed description 
of how it's done.  The key is getting the correct alignment between the 
case, brushes,  and the armature; and then tightening the case through-bolts 
down to a spec of 32 to 35 inch pounds.  If I get time, I'll try to put 
together a more detailed description of the process; or you might ask 
Dave.  But reportedly, if you get this aspect of it correct, she's going to 
run real sweet; while without it, she might not.
 
7. Those dealing with a complete MK unit which has 
the composite shaft should understand taking it all apart is not as easy as it 
is with the metal shaft.  The metal one can simply be unscrewed from the 
lower end case mounting collar; the composite one is still 1-1/8" tube and 
threaded, but it's put in with locktite, and to get it out you might have to 
chuck it up in a vise and go through some trouble.  Then, you might have to 
order a special tap from MK that will chase the threads in the lower end collar, 
which will probably be filled with locktite and composite residue.  
Something to be aware of before tearing into a composite shaft trolling motor 
setup....  
 
Anyway, Dave's a good guy to buy from or talk tech 
with, so give him a call or drop him an E sometime.
 
Hope this helps.
 
Pat