[PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls

Tue Mar 17 20:26:55 EDT 2015

Hank /Brian
1/8 O'ring is 0.121 depth not .143 for an imperial ring.
Make sure you check properly.
Chs Hugh

-----Original Message-----
From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of Brian Cox via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 1:19 p.m.
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls

Hank,
       Actually the 1/8" O ring calls for a .143 gland depth , and that would be on each side !  The groove cutters I've looked at did not go up that high considering the shank has to go in the 1/2" hole.  I'm sure it could be done, and your right about the surface area , but when you consider the tolerance of the shaft to the bore we're only talking about .005 difference or so.

Brian 

--- personal_submersibles at psubs.org wrote:

From: hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:03:35 -0700

Brian,
Sorry, my memory failed me, I just measured a spare o ring for the reach rod and it is .100 not .125 so it is a bit smaller.  
Hank--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 3/17/15, Brian Cox via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls
 To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 Received: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 6:34 PM

 Hank,
        That is an incredibly deep
 groove, and I don't see the reason for it.  I was  considering going with that size but getting a grooving tool  to go .125 thousandths is a long way to go, especially in a  1/2" hole !

 Brian

 --- personal_submersibles at psubs.org
 wrote:

 From: hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls
 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:26:57 -0700

 Brian,
 Gamma has 1/8 orings, I would go with 1/8 might be more  forgiveness.
 Hank
 --------------------------------------------
 On Tue, 3/17/15, Brian Cox via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 wrote:

  Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] thru hulls
  To: "PSubs" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
  Received: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 3:31 PM

  Hi
  All,
  Starting in on thru hull production.  I will need
  probably close to a dozen of them.  I'm making them
  all to accept a 1/2" stainless shaft, and I will be
  using 1/16"  O rings.  I don't see any
  need to use thicker diameter O
  rings ,  since the deeper O ring grooves
  can be a bit more problematic.   By the time my
  welder finishes all the remaining critical welds I should
  have my thru hulls done.   Also working on my
  forward hard ballast tank, approx. 18" in dia X 5'
  long
  .  Cheers, Brian 

  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

  _______________________________________________
  Personal_Submersibles mailing list
  Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
  http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

 _______________________________________________
 Personal_Submersibles mailing list
 Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
 http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

 _______________________________________________
 Personal_Submersibles mailing list
 Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
 http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 11336 (20150317) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 11336 (20150317) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com