[PSUBS-MAILIST] Snorkel

[James Frankland via Personal_Submersibles]

Yes, my OP valve does not have enough holes.  I have a job over the
winter to add more or drill existing holes bigger.

On 14 January 2015 at 13:04, Emile van Essen via Personal_Submersibles <
personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

> Mark, All.
>
> Mind the area is big enough. The valve in the attachment is designed for a
> 3000 Kg sub. But even then it is to small if you surface too quick in case
> of massive overpressure.
> Cracking pressure: 25-75 mBar.
>
>
> Best regards, Emile
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org
> ]
> Namens Mark via Personal_Submersibles
> Verzonden: dinsdag 13 januari 2015 13:12
> Aan: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
> Onderwerp: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snorkel
>
> Since we are discussing over-pressure valves, can you recommend a make and
> model, or describe its specifications?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark...
>
> Sent from iPhone.
>
> > On Jan 12, 2015, at 7:06 PM, Pete Niedermayr via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> >
> > Scott, I see you have an overpressure valve in place of the snorkel .
> Whats that on the other side ?
> >
> > Pete ?
> > --------------------------------------------
> > On Mon, 1/12/15, via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snorkel
> > To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion"
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> > Date: Monday, January 12, 2015, 5:09 PM
> >
> > I
> > would recommend a cabin overpressure valve instead. It is a
> > mushroom valve. You can see pics on my sub page. Alec
> > did the same thing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott Waters
> >
> >
> > -------- Original
> > Message --------
> > Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snorkel
> > From: Pete Niedermayr via Personal_Submersibles
> > <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> > Date: Mon, January 12, 2015 3:58 pm
> > To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
> >
> > I have a set of K 350 plans that I'm using as a
> > reference for my own design. I'm using the conning tower
> > plans pretty much as per. The question I do have is. Snorkel
> > or no snorkel ? On the one hand I can see how it would be
> > useful have. On the other hand no other design seems to have
> > one. What are your opinions? Snorkel or no snorkel?
> >
> > Pete
> > _______________________________________________
> > Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> > Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> > http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> >
> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> > Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> > http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> > <1399517720.jpg>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> > Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> > http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20150114/d4cfde37/attachment-0001.html>