[PSUBS-MAILIST] bolt in penetration
Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles
personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sat Jan 10 14:46:24 EST 2015
Parallel projects... Sister subs... Could be fun.
Sean
On January 10, 2015 12:19:38 PM MST, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
>Yes but there two of them.
>Hank--------------------------------------------
>On Sat, 1/10/15, Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] bolt in penetration
>To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion"
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> Received: Saturday, January 10, 2015, 2:16 PM
>
> If it is suitable, I presume you're calling
> dibs?
> Sean
>
>
>
>
> On January 10, 2015
> 12:10:14 PM MST, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
> Sean,
> I may be able to on Monday. The sphere was
> owned by a university and we can contact them to find the
> manufacturer. Given that is was used as a pressure vessel
> paid for by a university working on a government project, I
> have to assume it is good stuff. Not very scientific but a
> fair assumption at this stage. Luckily it is right in
> Brian's back yard in California so he was able to look
> at it and might be able to do some detective work.
>
> Hank
> On Sat, 1/10/15, Sean T. Stevenson via
> Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST]
> bolt in penetration
> To: "Personal
> Submersibles General Discussion"
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>
> Received: Saturday, January 10, 2015, 2:02 PM
>
> Hank, any chance you can
> find out what the alloy
> is? This will have
> a profound effect on its efficacy.
> Sean
>
>
>
>
> On!
> January
> 10, 2015
> 11:51:22 AM MST, hank pronk via
> Personal_Submersibles
>
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
> Sean,
>
> Thank you, that is helpful. My idea was to
>
> make the insert as tight as possible (sweat it in) I am
> not
> sure if the difference in material
> would cause a problem
> though. The idea of
> seating the port into the shell a good
>
> option also. I am just chewing the fat here, I have
> enough
> on my plate but it is fun to think
> about. I was wrong about
> the size, the
> sphere is 6 feet and I wrote 60 in. I imagine
> that kills the rating quite a bit?
> Hank
> On Sat, 1/10/15,
> Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re:
> [PSUBS-MAILIST]
> bolt in penetration
> To: "Personal
>
> Submersibles General Discussion"
>
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>
> Received: Saturday, January 10, 2015!
> , 1:40
> PM
>
> You could certainly
> do that,
> although a three inch
> thick shell is pretty
>
> substantial - I might consider
>
> machining
> eg. conical window seats in the
> hull sh!
> ell
> directly,
> and then derating the hull
> to a depth
> whereby the
> actual hull
>
> thickness is the effective derated thickness
> plus the effective reinforcement, which
> just
> happens to be a
>
> contiguous shell. The
> bolt-in arrangement
> would not act as
> hull
>
> reinforcement though - unless it was a force fit in the
> hole. The idea of reinforcements around
> openings is to
> provide
> material around the
> hole to carry the shell
> hoop
> stresses that
> would
> otherwise have passed through the
>
> material in the opening, such that you
> don't increase
> the nominal shell
> stress. This requires a
> (relatively)
> smooth load path to redirect
>
> stress around the hole. Br!
> ian
> recently
> asked me
> about the effectiveness of reinforcements
>
> like perpendicular flanges lining the hole,
>
> and this is a
> bit complicated, because
> some
> stress i!
> s
> indeed
>
> redirected into
> such a flange, but the load is not evenly
>
> distributed as you move inboar!
> d or
> outboard away from the
> hull
> shell (with
> diminishing returns at
> increasing
>
> distances),
> and you also introduce a stress concentration
> at
> the perpendicular
> transition. Ideally,
> reinforcements
> should
> be an effective
>
> thickening of the hull in the region
>
> immediately adjacent to the opening, tapered
> smoothly
> back
> (something
> like 4:1) into the hull
> shell to provide
> a
> continuous load path
>
> with no stress concentrations at abrupt
>
> changes in geometry.
> Sean
>
>
>
>
>
> On
> January 10, 2015 8:25:39
> !
>
>
> AM MST, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> wrote:
> Is it feasible to
> have a
> bolt in penetration in a 3 inch
> thick sphere
> hull. I am
>
> picturing machining a hole in
> the hull,
> then inserting a
> window housing
> with a shoulder(flange) that fits tight in
>
> the hole and is bolted in
> place. Can that arrangement
> act
> as reinforcement for the hul!
> l.
>
> Hank
>
>
>
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
> -----Inline Attachment
> Follows-----
>
>
> Personal_Submersibles
> mailing list
>
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
> -----Inline Attachment
> Follows-----
>
>
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20150110/f7be33ea/attachment.html>
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list