[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Hugh Fulton via Personal_Submersibles
personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sun Nov 2 16:45:57 EST 2014
Well that may give it a tendency to have a great view of the bottom.
Hugh
-----Original Message-----
From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org]
On Behalf Of hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: Monday, 3 November 2014 8:44 a.m.
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Vance,
One down side to this idea is weight, a 37 inch di by 7in thick window is
about 284 lbs.
Hank--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/2/14, Vance Bradley via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion"
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Received: Sunday, November 2, 2014, 2:36 PM
Which
viewport?
Sent from my
iPhone
On Nov 2,
2014, at 2:30 PM, Cliff Redus via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
wrote:
On
this calc, the operating depth is 350 ft and the crush depth of the
viewport is 2130 ft.
Cliff
From: Vance Bradley via
Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To: Personal
Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Sunday, November
2, 2014 8:27 PM
Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Operating 350
feet. Test depth 500.
Sent
from my iPhone
On Nov 2,
2014, at 2:19 PM, Cliff Redus via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
wrote:
Is the design
depth 350"?
Cliff
From: Vance Bradley via
Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To:
Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Sunday, November
2, 2014 8:06 PM
Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Cliff,
I'm thinking full hull diameter, 36" or thereabouts.Vance
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2,
2014, at 2:02 PM, Cliff Redus via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
wrote:
One of my
goals with the R500 was to cut cost and a big cost is the viewports.
The upper portion of the pressure hull that has the viewports is 36" x 0.25
A516-70 pressure vessel steel. The design depth is 500 ft. I like the
optics of flat viewports so I have one 24" diameter x 4" thick acrylic
viewport and three smaller 12"
viewports. I ran the calcs using the PVHO flat viewport calculator
that Jon Wallace implemented at the
PSubs site. I have access to abrasive water jet so I was thinking of
jetting these out of off the shelf acrylic and then having a machine shop
dress the edges and cut the chamfers. I would need to get the viewports
annealed after final machining. I am hoping I can
talk Gregg Cotrell into doing this for me as he is Dr.
Acrylic. PVHO has detailed info on what the viewport housing seat needs to
look like.
So to me, I don't see any reason
Vance you could not use large flat viewport on the bow. You just have to
do the PVHO calcs on the thickness and housing dimensions for your design
depth. You would need to design the housing to smoothly transition the
stresses to the forward head and run an FEA to confirm stresses in the
viewport and housing. I don't know what size you were thinking about or
the design depth but it would need be thick.
Cliff
From: hank pronk via
Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To: Personal
Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Sunday, November
2, 2014 7:02 PM
Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Lets wait and see what the engineers think. Cliff is going with a flat
port on the R500 I believe.
Hank
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/2/14, via
Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
wrote:
Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Received: Sunday, November 2, 2014, 12:20 PM
That's my
kind of madness.
Vance
-----Original
Message-----
From: hank pronk via
Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To: Personal Submersibles
General Discussion
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Sun, Nov 2, 2014 11:53
am
Subject: Re:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Vance,
That is a question for the engineers of coarse. I look at
it like the hull is a
big conning tower. Just look how
Gamma's CT is built,
instead of a
hatch it is
a flat port. I know I may be
over
simplifying it. The
engineers are
probably
thinking I am mad but.....
Hank
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/2/14, via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Received: Sunday, November 2, 2014, 11:13 AM
Hank,
It's not crazy at all. I just
hadn't
thought of it. I wonder if the
stresses
imposed at test
depth would be too high
for the 1/4" hull the thing
would be
welded to. It's an interesting thought,
though.
Something to consider,
definitely.
Vance
-----Original
Message-----
From:
hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
To:
personal_submersibles
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Sun, Nov 2, 2014
10:49 am
Subject:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] bow window
Vance,
Have you looked at a large full
size flat port for the
front
of your K350. I
did
that with one of my early subs. I had a 24 inch flat
port 4 inches thick
with
a 24 inch protection dome. The optics were stunning,
nobody believed it
was 4
inches thick. I checked with
Reynolds Polymer and a
7
inch thick 37inch
square
unpolished piece is 3,000 dollars US. Is that just
crazy talk or what.
Hank
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing
list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing
list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing
list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing
list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 10659 (20141102) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 10659 (20141102) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list