[PSUBS-MAILIST] venting batteries

hank pronk hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca
Tue Mar 11 18:11:46 EDT 2014 

Hi Jim,
Thanks' for the info,  I really have little choice but to go with wet batteries.  I am soooo over budget, plus I just dropped off my radio's to be over hauled.  I have been reduced to selling my steam engine collection.  :-(
Hank



On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 4:01:49 PM, "JimToddPsub at aol.com" <JimToddPsub at aol.com> wrote:
  
Hank, 
  
Some types of lithium ion batteries presently available might 
be just as economical as AGMs, etc. when you consider the number of recharging 
cycles - cost twice as much, but last more than twice as long.  Several 
subs are presently operating with them. 
  
Here's as good a place as any to start if you want to 
investigate those options.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery   
I've pasted a key paragraph below.  When I last looked 
into it I was most in favor of LFP.   
  
Chemistry, performance, cost and safety characteristics vary across LIB 
types. Handheld electronics mostly use LIBs based on lithium cobalt 
oxide (LiCoO
2), 
which offers high energy density, but presents safety risks, especially when 
damaged. Lithium iron 
phosphate (LFP), lithium manganese 
oxide (LMO) and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) offer lower 
energy density, but longer lives and inherent safety. Such batteries are widely 
used for electric tools, medical equipment and other roles. NMC in particular is 
a leading contender for automotive applications. Lithium nickel cobalt aluminum 
oxide (NCA) and lithium titanate (LTO) 
are specialty designs aimed at particular niche roles. 

Jim 

In a message dated 3/11/2014 4:39:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca writes: 
Joe, 
>It may be moot for you, you will be able to buy sulfur ion  batteries.  I am just looking to save some money in hopes the new  batteries are on the market next year.  If it is true about the sulfur  batteries our range will increase by six times. 
>Hank 
>
>
>
>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 3:27:57 PM,  Joe Perkel <josephperkel at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>So the question in my mind then with regard to George's scheme for  venting the pods as per plans,.. Is it adequate as is?  
>
> 
>My thoughts have always been to supplement that plan with ignition proof  forced ventilation. 
>
> 
>Joe 
>
>On Mar 11, 2014, at 5:06 PM, hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca>  wrote:
>
> 
>Vance, 
>>The nice thing about hydrogen is how light it is, with my idea  the hydrogen if leaked would simply drift to the hatch and out.  The  floor is not air tight so the Hydrogen can escape if the vent system has a  leak.  As with the original system, the battery vent system can be  pressure tested prior to charging.  Just sayin  
>>Hank 
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:50:55 PM,  Vance Bradley <VBra676539 at AOL.com> wrote:
>> 
>>Hank, 
>>Any low cost hydrogen vent system will leak. I've seen perfectly tight  systems tested with nitrogen that leak like sieves when charged with dive  gas. And if you have a leaky system then you have no system. Even a little  hydrogen can ruin your whole day. 
>>Vance
>>
>>Sent from my iPhone 
>>
>>On Mar 11, 2014, at 4:03 PM, hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca>  wrote:
>>
>> 
>>Vance, 
>>>I get that for sure, it just seems logical to vent the battery  directly.  What am I missing here?  Why vent the  Hydrogen into  a space then vent the space, makes no  sense. 
>>>Hank 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:19:53  AM, Vance Bradley <VBra676539 at AOL.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>Hank, 
>>>The vent system should be used for half an hour prior to charging to  clear the keel, then throughout the charge and finally for another half to  one hour afterward. What the maintenance log does not say is that somebody  forgot to turn on the LP supply air during a charge. It happened once on  Delta, too. Bang! Her deck plates all have a slight upward bulge as a  result. Oops. 
>>>Vance
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPhone 
>>>
>>>On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:43 AM, hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca>  wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>Steve,  
>>>>I am thinking interior of the hull.  Gamma has interior  batteries sealed in a box.  There is an air system to purge the box  after charging.  When I was reading the daily service reports, I  read about an instance where the box had an explosion due to a faulty  cable connection.  I was thinking of going one step further and  drilling in vent tubes in the sealed caps to carry the hydrogen  away.  I am not sure if this is a good idea or not, seems simple  and effective.  
>>>>Hank 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:09:52  AM, Steve McQueen <psub101 at indy.rr.com>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>Hank, in this scenario are the batteries interior to the hull or  exterior in pods?
>>>>Steve
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:09 PM,  hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone have an opinion on drilling in vent tubes  to  each battery, and seal off the original vent holes.   Run  the vent tubes to a manifold and purg.  Keep the vent tubes going  up hill all the way. 
>>>>>Hank
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>>>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>>>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>_______________________________________________
>>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>
>>
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles 
  mailing 
  list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20140311/800570d7/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Personal_Submersibles mailing list