[PSUBS-MAILIST] Motor Pod Ventilation
JimToddPsub at aol.com
JimToddPsub at aol.com
Sun Apr 13 21:47:02 EDT 2014
Joe,
Since the water doesn't have to be re-cooled as it does in a closed-loop
system, I think the ambient water should be quite adequate. The heat
transfer rate of water is much higher than air and you have an essentially
limitless supply.
Jim
In a message dated 4/13/2014 8:33:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
josephperkel at yahoo.com writes:
Sean,
Northern climates have nice cool seas, but I'm dealing with tropical
temps here averaging in the 80's in summer. With hot seas, which scheme would
be best? I simply am not certain, my gut says relying on the ambient water
may not do the job. I could be wrong.
Joe
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2014, at 9:16 PM, "Sean T. Stevenson" <_cast55 at telus.net_
(mailto:cast55 at telus.net) > wrote:
Airflow in constrained spaces is often difficult to model. Alternatives
include water cooled motors, or simply effectively heat sinking the motor
housings to the hull and using passive water cooling to the ambient seawater.
Ultimately, that's where the heat is going anyway. Unless you can use it
for some purpose (cabin heat, humidity control etc.) you might as well sink
it as directly as possible.
Sean
On April 13, 2014 6:45:39 PM MDT, Joe Perkel <_josephperkel at yahoo.com_
(mailto:josephperkel at yahoo.com) > wrote:
I am considering a scheme for dealing with electric motor cooling and
would like input on the viability of the idea and any pros or cons that I may
be missing.
In looking at my SeeHund replica, note that the torpedo/pod(s) length
exceed needed battery capacity. So the idea being that the aft ends of both
will house electric motors that are isolated from the battery compartments.
I’m thinking to ventilate these aft motor units into the aft machinery
space within the main hull. Incidentally, the hull diameter will be 42” and
the torpedoes #14 pipe. This will leave a significant airspace around these
motor units allowing me to use fan cooled motor cases. Each motor pod could
be connected with vent pipes for intake and output airflow, then the
machinery space itself force vented to the outside with main induction and
exhaust vents. All this for continuous surface running of course. Submerged,
the motor units would be intermittent duty.
The centerline unit would be fully enclosed and not vented, therefore not
as attractive for continuous duty due to thermal constraints.
Joe
____________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
_Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org_ (mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org)
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
--
Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
_Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org_ (mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org)
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
=
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20140413/df7f8c9b/attachment.html>
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list