[PSUBS-MAILIST] Diesel Exhaust
Hugh Fulton
hc.fulton at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 16:28:41 EDT 2013
Hi Marc,
I am in the final throes of finishing twin engine driven 2 man and I have
opted for the following:
2 x 2 Snorkels with plastic float valves leading into the cabin through 2 x
2 combination valves being manual ball valves coupled to air actuated
shuttle valves and fitted with non return valves.
This means that the non return valves will vent overpressure situation on
the surface and blow out through the snorkel float valves.
The snorkels are located inside an airbox leading into the boat part which
has about 4 cubic meters of air volume so that if I go through a wave the
float valve does not get to close and the air is drawn from the air box
volume for a brief period.
The air is then drawn from the cabin again through 2 x combination valves
into the engine pressure chambers. The exhaust which also takes a large
portion of the engine cooling water goes through a raised exhaust line above
the water level then down through an air operated shuttle valve and a non
return valve exiting underwater through the center of the propeller as per
an outboard motor or stern leg. According to the rules you should have 2
valves on the exhaust. I am relying on the air drawn through the cabin for
cooling and as most of the cabin is protected by fiberglass I am hoping that
it wont get too much direct heating from the sun apart from through the
domes. When the air operated shuttle valves are closed ready for diving the
engines will pull a vacuum of approx 1-2 psi before shutting down. IF no
vacuum maintained then no dive and the engines keep running. All untested
yet but hoping I am only about 8 weeks away. Carstens system is all tested
and proven. Regards, Hugh
From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org]
On Behalf Of
Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2013 6:33 a.m.
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Diesel Exhaust
Hi Marc,
before I response in detail, which size should the sub have? And which
range?
And which kind of wave high, wave length and weather you want to survife on
the surface?
Any concept sketch? Do you like to snorckel with the sub?
Euronaut has more problems with the short medium high wave in the baltic
than with the high but long waves in the north sea.
Bad weather in the north sea lift the hole boat before the wave reach the
sail, but in the Baltic the waves are
shorter and did mot lift the boat so much - as result the sail goes very
wet. Like in the movie "Das Boot"
Short wave in the baltic:
http://www.euronaut.org/content/gfx/operational/IMG_8705.jpg
Here the over waterline exhaust of Euronaut in operation.
The funny sound comes from a wave flap close to the end of the exhaust
which goes up and down at idlle speed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT7i05s92ak
Cooling is also something you should have in mind.
And noise..
And..
vbr Carsten
From: Marc de Piolenc <piolenc at archivale.com>
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Dive report - Pickles Reef
I've been following this discussion with great interest. I don't
have a
sub yet, but I do live in the Tropics, and as there's no cold current
handy to where I live any subbing I do will be in water pretty near air
temperature. As you might expect, I've given this problem a lot of
thought.
My tentative conclusion is that, if I build a sub, I will have to make
it more autonomous than is the rule on this list. Specifically, it will
need a combustion engine to ferry itself on the surface to dive sites,
and to maintain comfort and keep the battery topped off for diving while
doing so. I started with the assumption that I would need an air
conditioning unit running off a small industrial diesel, but then I
realized that, if I use a snorkel exhausting into the cabin, and have
the diesel draw air from the cabin, I get continuous renewal of the air
in the cabin without the cost, power burden and safety problems of
running a Rankine cycle refrigeration system. That's the solution that
I've retained for the moment. Of course I also need a secure means of
preventing exhaust gas from being aspirated into the snorkel (I can't
quite understand how naval submarines manage to combine both functions
in one mast), but that might be as simple as having the diesel exhaust
flush with the hull, with some arrangement to prevent water from coming
in. Since the diesel would only be used on the surface, and the snort
would only be there to allow a low-freeboard hatch to be kept closed,
the power penalty would be minimal.
Fuel storage, fuel feed and the like still have to be worked out. Naval
submarines have very complex arrangements for this, and that complexity
must be tolerated for a good reason. Even so, I need a simpler way to do
it that still protects the fuel from contamination and me from asphyxiation.
Marc de Piolenc
--
Carsten Standfuß
Dipl.Ing.Schiffbau @ Meerestechnik
Heinrich Reck Str.12A
18211 Admannshagen
0172 8464 420
WWW.Euronaut.org
Carsten at euronaut.org
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 8903 (20131010) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20131012/3f3b98d4/attachment.html>
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list