[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Typhoon
Michael B Holt wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 1999 08:36:42 -0400 Jonathan Shawl writes:
> [snip] I once saw a line
> >drawings in a magazine like maybe Pop Sci. or Mech. Illustrated,
>
> Is MI still being published? I always liked it.
Naw - it was nixed. Don't know if it transmogrified into something else.
> >showing that it may actually have 2 main pressure hulls side by side
> with a
> >3rd smaller round hull nested between them on top, just under the con.
Bingo
> [snip]
> That's a big part of it, but the sail shape does change flow over
> the rudders and screws at higher speeds. Shape the sail wrong
> and the controls can reverse at some speeds.
Chinese Planes. Comes from extemely slow fwd. movement.
> >If you are just building a display model or a wet sub, then yes it is a
> >simple to build shape. Has anyone ever found any other info to support
> >or show this twin hull idea?
Try Jane's Fighting Ships. May not show internals, however.
Rick
--
????กำ?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Typhoon
- From: shawl@torchlake.com (Jonathan Shawl)
- Magazines
- From: shawl@torchlake.com (Jonathan Shawl)