Re: new psubs members

[Rick Lucertini <empiricus@sprint.ca>]

j barton wrote:

> Psubs,
> Both types of subs are interesting to me but the dry ones seem very complicated and expensive when you read the info available like crush depth calculations from you Alec.  I didn't know I was doing the psubs "no no" and hurt some egos, so I'll stop my wet sub questions.  So I don't bother the whole list anymore, tell me how does a new psubs "member" talk just to a wet sub expert within psubs when they seem to just lurk?  Ginger, are you still out there alone too?  Should anyone else like wet subs also and want to help me, please e-mail me off the psubs list.  Is there another web site for personal submarines on the net?  Thanks to Al, F. Phillips and Vance for your responses and help.  Jack

Damn - OK YOU GUYS - LISTEN UP!!!

Once and for all: let's make sure we include ALL members, OK?  That is our mandate, after all.

I completely missed the latest flame session, thank God.  Jack - I don't know how it happened but, wet sub enthusiasts are peppered all over this list.  DO NOT - I REPEAT - DO NOT ever stop asking any kind of PSUBS related questions.

It is quite daunting to have to wade through hundreds of archives just to find the answer to a question.

Most PSUBS related issues have been discussed.  More than enough info is available from the list to build a sub of almost any kind.  We no longer really need to discourse over many issues.  So, there goes most dialogue down the ceramic altar.

If we stop dialogue - we no longer have a list.

Let's all keep asking - and accept the various levels of knowledge and interest.

ALL RISE . . .



--
Rick Lucertini
empiricus@sprint.ca
(Vancouver, Canada)
________________________

"Outside of a dog books are a man's best friend -
Inside of a dog there isn't enough light to read."

   Groucho Marx