[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: A Simpler Sub
Perhaps he realizes such a controller has a very large potential market
to SCUBA divers who don't want to spend so much time monitoring their
depth and buoyancy. If he does have a truly functional and compact
unit, it would have a significant market. That raises a good question
too. Is such a device already on the market, and can it be adapted to a
sub? Food for thought.
> ----------
> From: Daniel Stuelke[SMTP:dstuelke@magick.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 2:54 PM
> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
> Subject: Re: A Simpler Sub
>
> Hello, All - My instructor, the designer
> of the controller, had made it clear to
> me, after some
> prodding, that it was actually an
> electronic device. My impression from
> having tapped his brain on
> more than one occasion, was that what you
> and I would have used wasn't quite as
> esoteric as he would
> have liked. He seemed quite proud of "his"
> controller but I just couldn't drag the
> proprietary
> information out of him. Heck of a nice
> guy, but stubborn :-)
>
> The description you gave is certainly the
> route I would have taken. However, the
> "because it's there"
> syndrome is too overwhelming to pass up by
> electro-techies !
>
> Rick Lucertini
> Vancouver, Canada
>
>
> Maybe he used optical proximity sensors to control water level inside
> the hull. Just a thought but it should work.
>
> Daniel.
>