[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snoopy dive report



I was wondering about that one myself Jim, but happy to say there were no issues at all with that.

 

Thanks,


Alec

 

From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of JimToddPsub@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:27 AM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snoopy dive report

 

Hi Alec,

 

Did you encounter any asymmetrical issues in the operation of the saddle tanks?  When you were flooding or purging them, did you encounter any roll or list?

 

Thanks,

Jim

 

In a message dated 4/22/2012 9:27:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Alec.Smyth@compuware.com writes:

Hello Hugh,

 

Please see the project page for details on those valves. They are bronze ball valves with mounting flanges, and I'm operating them with O-ring sealed through-hulls, no longer putting the valve stem directly through the hull a la George.

 

Best,

 

Alec

 


On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:52 PM, "Hugh Fulton" <hc.fulton@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Alec,

Great to hear that you are getting multiple dives easily.

I took out the Comsub with a bunch of experienced guys who had dived with Noah.

We were also riding the bubble as we were still a bit heavy and the VBT’s had no level gauge  which I found was a pain.

We had problems with one of the solenoid valves venting one of the 4 MBT’s.  The valve is only ½” so getting it under initially was a pain.

What valves are you using and how do you operate them?  Are they standard George through the hull handles?

I think  I would like to go to at least ¾” valves but tossing up whether to use solenoid valves or custom air operated vents on the top of the tanks. 

We had hydraulic thrusters so there was a bit of noise which made it harder to hear the tanks blowing and venting.  Anyway we got in over 3 hours of diving so it was a first for us in a real test in open water tho not deep and vis was lousy.

Had a lot of fun anyway

Just got some photos from the trip so will post when I find out how to.  Chs  Hugh.

 

From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Smyth, Alec
Sent: Sunday, 22 April 2012 12:21 p.m.
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Snoopy dive report

 

Hi Folks,

I just spent the whole day yesterday diving Snoopy with Greg Cottrell, Dan Lance, and Les Sonnenmark (who designed Snoopy’s thruster controls) at Bainbridge quarry in Pennsylvania. It was a blast, and we made perhaps twenty or more dives safely. Here’s how it went.

These were Snoopy’s first dives with saddle tanks and with a crew of two. The tanks turned out really well and helped Snoopy come off her trailer much earlier than she used to, which was good given the quarry didn’t have a proper boat ramp.  The tanks also added about four inches of freeboard, which doesn’t sound like much but feels like a substantial difference when you consider it used to be eight inches. There’s better stability on the surface. But the main purpose of the saddle tanks was to facilitate “riding a bubble” since Snoopy no longer has a VBT. We certainly did a lot of bubble riding, and with two people it was a challenge. I had been wondering whether we would really need to add or remove ballast to adjust for different crew weights, or whether it might be an option instead to permanently install ballast for one person, and ride a large bubble when operating with a crew of two. Who wants to ship or unship two hundred pounds of weights? So we tried it.  The saddle tanks, when fully blown, have 440 lbs of lift. Well, my impression is that it is POSSIBLE to do so, but mighty tricky, at least in conditions of low visibility and uneven bottoms. We got better at it with practice, but I think it will be worth it removing the extra weight when a second crewmember comes aboard.

Here’s how it would typically go with the “large bubble” approach:

1)      Flood MBTs on the surface until neutral

2)      Motor down

3)      At perhaps 20 or 30 feet, you realize you’re dropping fast even after turning off the thrusters

4)      You watch your rapidly decreasing altitude on the depth sounder, and start blowing air into the MBTs to level off before hitting bottom

The problem is that the sub has a lot of momentum, and the air you inject takes a while to slow it. If you keep blowing until you stop falling, you find yourself rising a moment later, and would need to start dumping air. Thus you have to stop the blow while you’re still falling, which is logical yet hard to judge.

Let’s return to that item #1. The flood valve on the new saddle tanks is large (1” diameter). This had the desired effect of speeding dives and allowing rapid dumping of an expanding bubble on ascent, but it also had a side effect I had not anticipated. Standard procedure is to open the flood valve and let out MBT air until the apex of the dome is level with the surface, at which time you close the valve and find yourself neutrally buoyant. But when I did this with the large bore valve, I found the boat went right on past the apex of the dome. The speed of the air release had set the boat bobbing up and down, making it very hard to find the sweet spot. The frequency of oscillation was very low, but the amplitude was considerable, about a foot. The take-away is that the big valve is great for quick dives if you are correctly ballasted, but if you are going to ride a bubble, only crack the valve instead of opening it full bore.

Now, if you have weighted the sub relatively accurately, and have little or no bubble, things are dramatically easier than with the large bubble. So long as your buoyancy is within the power limits of your thrusters, the thruster speed control knob becomes your depth adjustment knob. Start with the boat slightly positive and motor down. Reduce the thruster speed and you rise, increase it and you descend.

The area of the quarry we were diving in is used for SCUBA classes. It’s full of buoys, mid-water platforms, and all the lines holding them down. There were sunken boats, and especially lot of trees. The terrain was both sloping and curving, and the visibility very poor. Which is to say, we certainly got a workout trying to navigate among all this. I found the best approach was to have the person lying down in the bow control the thrusters, and the one sitting in the conning tower control the buoyancy. The person looking through the bow viewport can best see obstacles ahead, but the person in the coning tower can look up at the surface, and also has better access to depth gauge and depth sounder. This division of labor seemed to be complementary rather than cause any interference.

I’ve also updated the project page, and you’ll see Snoopy is looking less and less like a K-250.

Cheers,

 

Alec



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7075 (20120421) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7075 (20120421) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com