Hi guys,
Sorry for late reply with this, ive been on a misserable course for
work.
Alec. Yes, im also concernded about hp air passing the
gauges. Hence the question. But, i suppose i could put a ball
valve in the line before the gauge and close it before operating the hp
air. Bit of an extra step, but would protect the gauges, plus id have to
remember to open the valve again after or i'd get incorrect readings.
But a possibility.
Vance. Im not 100% sure i understand. Do you mean use the
bottom bulkhead fitting and separate it out? If so, that fitting goes
into the VBT, which could be full of water, or air and at various
pressures? Surely you must mean something else?
Alan. Again, sorry but i dont understand how the gauge could read
10ft short. I suspect your thining the hp air would always be on.
It would be connected to a diving tank and valve, so the check valve
would only be stopping water going into the hp piping, it wouldnt have any
pressure on the "air" side until i cracked the tank.
Good ideas for both the flood valve fitting and overpressure valve.
But unfortunately, both wont fit to a 1/4 or 1/2 inch pipe.
I think im going to "T" it off from the forward ballast tank and have the
extra ball valve to shut off the valves to protect them from the tank
blow.
Also!, has anyone goot a better copy of page K-350 - 13 pipe arrangement
i could have? I have a copy that came with my plans, but its such a
dreadfull photocopy that i cant read half of it. I can work it out of
course, but it would be nice to actually see what the official plans
say.
Many thanks as always,
James
On 31 October 2011 21:24, Smyth, Alec
<Alec.Smyth@compuware.com>
wrote:
Hi
James,
I would
worry about the effect of a ballast blow on your depth gauge. In
addition, my suggestion would be to put check valves directly on the
through-hull of each MBT, rather than use a ball valve as indicated in your
diagram. In effect, you then have automatic hull stops. I've found
a through-hull such as would be needed for a depth gauge can be
welded in with only a local touch-up required to the paint. But
here's another idea... do you have a through-hull for an overpressure valve?
I used to have my overpressure valve and depth gauge share the same
through-hull.
Thanks,
Alec
The contents
of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains
information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or
an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone
else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then
destroy it.
Hi All,
Can i ask people's opinion on this. Due to an oversight on my
part, i am missing a through hull for a depth gauge.
So, i have an idea. I was thinking of putting the gauges on the
same line as the HP air for the forward tank. In this
configuration. See fantastic picture attached (i am at work so i only
have microsoft paint). Hope the pic makes it through.
The idea is i have the through hull, stop valve, t piece (or even a "Y"
piece) leading to 2 x redundant chemical protected gauges on one "t" and on
the other, the check valve followed by the hp air. Easier to see in
the picture.
This should allow water to the gauges while not filling the whole line
to the hp tank.
The check valve is 400 bar with a cracking pressure of 5psi.
The only problem i can see is that when blowing air, it may
interfere\damage the gauges? Bearing in mind they are chemical
protected so have a diaphram that will protect them from the water
itself.
Unless anyone has any better ideas. (I will have a normal diviers
gauge outside, but i want proper gauges inside).
Thanks
James