Hi, Frank,
As you mentioned, a larger diameter prop is somewhat more
efficient than a smaller one. The problem is that it bumps into
things and otherwise gets in the way.
The movement of a fish tail is complex; much more to it than just
wagging back and forth. It undulates to an extent, carries the motion all
the way to the head of the fish, and varies that motion depending on that
the fish is doing -- cruising, darting, turning, etc. The biggest
advance in understanding the dynamics comes from having computers that can now
measure multiple motion points on the fish and analyze it in all its
variations. The other half of the problem is constructing a
mechanism that can duplicate that motion (again, in all its variations).
As you pointed out, it would be a lot easier to configure cruise mode.
You may have seen boats used in the orient that are propelled by
a long, hinged oar that is wagged back and forth at the rear of the boat much
like a fish tail. Sorry I don't know what it's called. The oarsman
is standing and the boat rocks back and forth with each stroke. I've only
seen them in National Geographic type films. Maybe someone has eyes-on
experience.
Take care,
Jim
In a message dated 11/19/2010 8:41:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
ShellyDalg@aol.com writes:
|