[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Bubble of doom



Water Musick?
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: irox <irox@ix.netcom.com>
Sender: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:40:24 
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Bubble of doom


This would be the perfect time to play the Das Boot sound track,
or maybe something a little more soothing would be more appropriate.

Cheers!
 Ian.

-----Original Message-----

From: Greg Cottrell 

Sent: Aug 20, 2010 12:23 PM

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Bubble of doom


























Yeah…it would definitely be nerve
wracking. We better take along some light reading material for the wait.

 



Greg Cottrell

Project Manager

 

 

greg@precisionplastics.com

http://www.precisionplastics.com

 

P please consider the environment before printing this email 











From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of vbra676539@aol.com

Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010
11:39 AM

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST]
Bubble of doom



 

A vent
valve, perhaps? Just to let the air bubble out. Water from the flood valve
lower down would continue to equalize. It would be a nerve wracking wait,
though, wouldn't it?

 



-----Original
Message-----

From: Greg Cottrell <greg@precisionplastics.com>

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Sent: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 11:01 am

Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Bubble of doom







Hi Vance,





 





You’ve brought up an interesting point
about the release of air from a sub during egress. George Kittredge had a
similar experience of being “shot out” of a sub (although his sub was full of
over pressurized air). I wonder if it might be a good idea to put a flood valve
in the hatch to flood a sub completely before getting out?





 





 







Greg Cottrell





Project Manager





 





 





greg@precisionplastics.com





http://www.precisionplastics.com





 





P please
consider the environment before printing this email 















From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
[mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of vbra676539@aol.com

Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:25
AM

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Scuba
tank hook up







 





Alan, 







 









I must be missing something here. What is
the last 15% of the volume in a flooding scenario? I've never had to do it, but
flooding the boat equalizes pressure inside and out. The volume of air
compresses in a high point
to that same pressure. All you would need was a BIBS and a face mask or
something. No increase of pressure inside would be necessary unless your intent
is to maintain a larger air bubble inside the boat, which would be dangerous
unless you happened to have a bottom hatch (assuming the boat is in an attitude
where it could even be used).









 









One caveat about air in the boat that I
do know about is the violence of that bubble's release when the hatch is
opened. In the Nekton Beta accident, the bubble shot Rick Slater out of the
boat like a cork out of a champagne bottle, and the sudden movement of water
flooding in to replace that air is probably what caused the other passenger to
bang his head, which either caused directly or contributed to his drowning at
depth. Based on that, it seems that a larger bubble might very well cause
proportionally larger problems.









 









Mind you, flooding the boat is a pretty
big problem all by itself. It gives me the shivers just thinking about it.









 









Vance





 







-----Original
Message-----

From: Recon1st@aol.com

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Sent: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 8:53 am

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Scuba tank hook up









Alan I would not use air
to equalize in an emergency. I would simply open my flood









valve and let the
incoming water do the job. This would allow time to equalize your









ears and such. And the
volume of air exploding from the tower is much less violent. 









 









Personally I prefer to
have full pressure to the hull and regulate it inside. In all scenarios









I can think of, a high
flow is not needed. Filling tanks and such, a slow fill seems to be









much more controllable.









 









Dean









 











In a message dated 8/19/2010 6:52:01 P.M.
Central Daylight Time, alanjames@xtra.co.nz
writes:











Hi Dean,









I've got more questions than answers
here.









If we use air to pressurize the last 15%
of the sub volume in an emergency escape,









wouldn't it be better to have the full
pressure of the tank coming in through the hull?









I googled but couldn't find anything on
the flow rate of air coming straight out of a









scuba tank compared to what it might be
coming out of a first stage regulator or









your 250 psi regulator. ( I guess hose
width figures in the equation.) 









I did open up my dive tank into a rubbish
bag & it blew it up about 4 x faster straight from 









the tank at 3000 psi than from the 2nd
stage purge valve.









In the case of a 200ft deep escape your
250 psi regulator would be operating at 150 psi 









above the ambient pressure required in
the hull to do the final equalization. Having a faster 









fill might make the difference between
getting the bends or not.









Alan









 











----- Original Message ----- 









From: Recon1st@aol.com 









To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org 









Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 6:55 AM









Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Scuba tank hook up









 









Sorry for the omission.
The Tanks will be external and all I would need is HP. I have 









regulators inside and
the ability to crank em up to 250 psi. I guess what I am looking for









is yoke type with out
the regulator.









 









Dean









 











In a message dated 8/19/2010 11:26:37
A.M. Central Daylight Time, vbra676539@aol.com
writes:









External or internal? And are you set up
for high pressure or not? HP air can be had with a simple yoke (like a first
stage without the regulator). If you need lower pressure, then the first stage
will work fine. George carried his internally, which was an issue at depth
because scuba first stages can only be cranked up to about 150-160 pounds.
Externally, you get that over ambient, which gives you full flow. The only
other issue is flow. The 1st stage arrangement is pretty slow. 







Vance





 







-----Original
Message-----

From: Recon1st@aol.com

To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Sent: Thu, Aug 19, 2010 12:03 pm

Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Scuba tank hook up









What have any of you
done to hook up standard SCUBA tanks for HP air source.









Originally I was using a
large steel tank. It is just too heavy to handle and I am









switching to
twin Aluminum 100 tanks.









 









I am thinking a scuba
first stage regulator is used with an adaptor at the thru hull 









connection. 









 









Appreciate any help









 









Dean



************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************