[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hull Penetration and Reinforcement



Jon,
The replacement of metal is not worked out as area of a hole but as the area
of the cross section which makes it more conservative.  Also the limit of
the reinforcement is 2.5 times the thickness on either side but not taking
into account the thickness of the shell. The thickness in the calcs for the
area is taken as the required thickness not actual.  The reinforcement area
of the conning tower is therefore limited to (2 x .75) x (5 x .25). Of
course I have not taken into consideration the corrosion allowance nor have
I calculated the required thickness.  You must select your material and
depth and stiffener spacing to arrive at minimum required thickness.
Regards, Hugh


  
the ABS Steel Vessel Rules document:

Part 4 - Vessel Systems and Machinery
Chapter 4 - Boilers, Pressure Vessels and Fired Equipment
Section 1 - Appendix 1 - Rules for Design
7 Openings and Reinforcements

First, I have a specific question related to Figure 8 on page 311, 
elements Tn and Trn at the top left of the nozzle. Did they mark the 
illustration incorrectly? The variable Tn is defined as the nozzle wall 
thickness exclusive of corrosion allowance. The variable Trn is defined 
as the required nozzle wall thickness exclusive of corrosion allowance 
for a maximum working pressure. The equations using these elements look 
correct (Tn-Trn) which would complement the idea of calculating the 
amount of reinforcement provided by the thickness of the nozzle above 
that required for the working pressure. However, the illustration for 
Trn appears to show a sliver of metal as the actual difference between 
Tn and Trn, rather than how Trn is defined in the text. Looking at the 
illustration, I would have expected Trn to be shown as the material with 
the "\" lines through it (or the "/" lines in the right segment) rather 
than the sliver of metal it is currently pointing to.

2010 ABS rule 4-4-1A1/7.1 restricts the calculations for penetration 
reinforcement of shells 60in diameter or less, to 1/2 the shell diameter 
but not exceeding 20 inches. For a typical K-sub (36 inch diameter) this 
means the calculations are valid for a conning tower or viewport no 
wider than 18 inches (457mm). The rule states "Reinforcement of larger 
openings is to be submitted for specific approval".

I don't think I've ever seen a conning tower on any PSUB that is 18 
inches or smaller, and most appear to be 22 to 24 inches in diameter. 
For those of you not working off of K-sub plans, what are you using as a 
guide to calculate the thickness of the conning tower and/or 
reinforcement metal? Busby (http://busby.psubs.org) stated in Chapter 5, 
Page 255 (Hull Penetrations) that an ASME standard is to replace 100% of 
the material taken from the hull. If I calculated correctly however, 
Kittredge replaced the K-sub conning tower penetration with about 400% 
of the material taken from the hull (can anyone check my numbers? Hull 
thickness 1/4inch, conning tower ring is 24.5 x .75 x 9 inches).

Have I missed another ABS document that deals with this issue? 
Notwithstanding submission of a design to an ABS surveyor, what is the 
best practice PSUBS be promoting for this issue?

Jon




************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4995 (20100402) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4995 (20100402) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 




************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************