|
Besides, one
of the coolest things to do with a sub is to get a photo like the famous
one of Jean Piccard...
Now THAT
was a viewport.
:) The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
[mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Brent
Hartwig
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 16:13 To: PSUBSorg Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] K350 porthole question Hi Frank, I was talking with Greg Cottrell a while back, and he said for the depths that my sub goes the conical viewports are not needed, and that the basic flat viewport gives you far more warning before it fails. He also mentioned that Stachiw's favorite viewport was a basic flat viewport. But they make me feel like I'm in a Alvin type sub that cost loads of money. ;)' Szybowski From: ShellyDalg@aol.com Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:53:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] K350 porthole question To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org I like those conical ports in the tower. Always thought that was the best
way to do it. It sure eats up a lot of viewing area though. I know the expensive
subs that go DEEP use that design. I can see where it's easier to get the disk
out too. Maybe next time......Frank D. A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! |
