Jon, I don't disagree with the membership concept, but I do question the value of splitting the mailing list. I'm not convinced that PSubs has enough traffic to do this effectively without either resulting in all traffic moving to one forum, or burying otherwise good information in a forum with only a handfull of messages in it. Particularly on an email distributed list like this - the way around these problems is with the use of an advanced forum software which separates messages by topic but still permits browsing by date, or allowing a user to see only the most recent posts. Shiftng PSubs to such a system would be a major change that would alter the character of the forum - perhaps a referendum is in order?
-Sean
On Jan 22, 2009, jon@psubs.org wrote:
Combining and conglomerating questions/answers.
>Is this really necessary?????????????
>I don't see the need for changes...
>I'm not interested in a club here.
>The idea was to share what I can with folks who were interested.
There's no requirement to join, and in terms of discussion forums you
aren't missing out on anything unless an interesting topic appears in a
member-only list that you want to participate in. As noted earlier,
non-members will have access to member-only archives to ensure
information is distributed freely. Assuming you see an interesting
topic on a members-only forum that you would like to participate in, you
then have two options. One, join PSUBS so you can participate in that
topic. Two, convince the member to bring the topic to the public
mailing list so that you can interact with them.
In terms of sharing information with interested folks, there's nothing
to stop non-members from starting advanced topics in the public mailing
list and draw members there to discuss it instead of a members-only
forum. Some members may opt-out of the public mailing list, but I'm
guessing the majority will remain there so as not to miss anything
interesting that pops up.
There are numerous people who have indicated that they are interested in
a "club" or more formal organization, and have suggested the same for
many years. I see this as just part of the normal growing process.
Some people like to "belong" to something, have a membership card to
show it, and just provide the financial support that membership dues
provide. ASME has membership, MTS has membership, even the YMCA has
membership. Membership binds you a bit closer to people who share the
same interest that you do and can provide the "kickstart" they need to
become more involved. For example, many people are members of the NRA,
Sierra Club, Green Peace, and other similar organizations even though
they don't have direct participation. But they believe in what the
group stands for so they support the group with their membership.
As well, membership allows us to show more structure so we are taken
more seriously by the industry as a whole (I know some of you don't care
about this). It's really difficult to get a discount from a supplier
for the "group", when the "group" is actually anyone who decides to
visit the website. Without a "membership", any potential discount from
a supplier is effectively a discount to the world and most suppliers
already have a price schedule for the "world" which they call "retail".
>The only time I saw the need for "moderating" was to intervene in
defusing a few heated discussions that cropped up over the years.
> Why the sudden need for exclusivity?
There are numerous people who feel the public list is too lax because
there is too much non-sub "fluff", too many questions that get asked
over and over again, or who simply want a place available for more
targeted topics rather than "everything under one roof". This is a
common theme I hear privately at most every convention. Some people
like to use the public list as a spring-board to start new friendships
and feel a little light-heartedness is appropriate. There are other
people who are not interested in this type of interaction and want to
discuss or read technical discussions only. In regards to discussion
lists, rather than thinking of PSUBS membership as exclusionary, you can
think of membership as the penalty for having your cake and eating it
too. For those that want no-nonsense discussion with appropriate
moderation that includes booting those who do not respect the intent of
the list, it will cost them a membership fee.
> Is there some fiscal need for membership fee?
There's always a fiscal need for money. Membership fees will help cover
the cost of conventions, and we may actually be able to provide a
speakers fee if there is a professional speaker that we might want to
talk to us. Perhaps we can invest in some technical projects by our
members that look promising.
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.
If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.
PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 53
Weare, NH 03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************